[Bug libgomp/35364] New: ICE on ia64 with vector declaration inside #pragma omp parallel

2008-02-25 Thread steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35364

[Bug libgomp/35364] ICE on ia64 with vector declaration inside #pragma omp parallel

2008-02-25 Thread steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch
--- Comment #1 from steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch 2008-02-25 10:35 --- Created an attachment (id=15221) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15221action=view) Preprocessed file (.ii) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35364

[Bug target/35364] ICE on ia64 with vector declaration inside #pragma omp parallel

2008-02-25 Thread steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch
--- Comment #3 from steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch 2008-02-25 18:20 --- (In reply to comment #2) What is the ICE? Segmentation fault. GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 Compiler executable checksum: 84cf8bc685ded1e544606791a260313c ice.h

[Bug libgomp/33333] New: libgomp omp-low.c:4251 generates internal compiler error

2007-09-07 Thread steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch
Version: 4.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3

[Bug libgomp/33333] libgomp omp-low.c:4251 generates internal compiler error

2007-09-07 Thread steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch
--- Comment #2 from steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch 2007-09-07 14:42 --- Created an attachment (id=14170) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14170action=view) Preprocessed file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3

[Bug libgomp/33333] libgomp omp-low.c:4251 generates internal compiler error

2007-09-07 Thread steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch
--- Comment #1 from steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch 2007-09-07 14:41 --- Created an attachment (id=14169) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14169action=view) Source code which fails to compile -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3

[Bug c++/30711] New: Ifstream bug using Red Hat g++-4.1.0 compared to g++-4.0.2

2007-02-06 Thread steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30711

[Bug c++/30711] Ifstream bug using Red Hat g++-4.1.0 compared to g++-4.0.2

2007-02-06 Thread steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch
--- Comment #1 from steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch 2007-02-06 10:05 --- Created an attachment (id=13012) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13012action=view) Code for testing the bug -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30711

[Bug c++/30711] Ifstream bug using Red Hat g++-4.1.0 compared to g++-4.0.2

2007-02-06 Thread steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch
--- Comment #2 from steigers at phys dot ethz dot ch 2007-02-06 10:33 --- Apparently if the close() statement is followed by a clear() statement it works. I t also works if close() is omitted and only clear() is called. I therefore suspect that someone forgot to change the status