https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121406
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Heumann ---
FWIW, that non-bugs entry can easily be read as just saying that GCC will not
type-check arguments when calling non-prototyped functions, which is consistent
with the standards. If GCC is intentionally not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121406
Bug ID: 121406
Summary: Type compatibility checks between old-style function
definition and prototyped function type ignore
parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120899
Bug ID: 120899
Summary: Duplicate diagnostics about jump into scope of
pointer-to-VLA variable
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120898
Bug ID: 120898
Summary: ICE at -O2 calling function with old-style definition
taking a VLA parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108079
Bug ID: 108079
Summary: -Wunused-variable gives misleading duplicate warning
for unused static local variable
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107926
Bug ID: 107926
Summary: wrong error message for excess elements in array
initializer using a string literal
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107166
Bug ID: 107166
Summary: "useless type name in empty declaration" diagnostic
may refer to wrong location
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107164
Bug ID: 107164
Summary: No pedantic warning for declaration just referring to
a previously-declared enum type
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Ke
