[Bug debug/37890] Incorrect nesting for DW_TAG_imported_declaration

2009-03-19 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2009-03-19 20:07 --- Hmm.. compiling the testcase from comment #2 with gcc from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=94544 still produces import statements only at the global level: ... 142: Abbrev Number: 4

[Bug debug/39471] DW_TAG_imported_module should be used (not DW_TAG_imported_declaration)

2009-03-17 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #12 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2009-03-17 15:17 --- (In reply to comment #9) I no longer see any DWARF problem there but Archer C++ still does not work with g++-4.4. Assuming an Archer bug due to the new DW_TAG_lexical_block block. Yes there are a couple I am

[Bug debug/37982] Extraneous DW_TAG_variable tag

2008-12-01 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #8 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-12-01 16:12 --- DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name should be removed from GCC only after the DW_AT_name scoping/qualification will get fully fixed. GDB currently already contains the DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name reader and there is probably

[Bug debug/37982] Extraneous DW_TAG_variable tag

2008-11-28 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-11-28 16:33 --- (2) Defining declaration 86 should point by DW_AT_specification to its non-defining declaration 37. (The DWARF citation is here from Dodji.) (But I do not see these two problems as real issues for debugging

[Bug debug/37982] New: Extranious DW_TAG_variable tag

2008-10-31 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
org ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37982

[Bug debug/37982] Extranious DW_TAG_variable tag

2008-10-31 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-10-31 19:06 --- Created an attachment (id=16602) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16602action=view) testcase file 1 of 3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37982

[Bug debug/37982] Extranious DW_TAG_variable tag

2008-10-31 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-10-31 19:07 --- Created an attachment (id=16603) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16603action=view) testcase file 2 of 3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37982

[Bug debug/37982] Extranious DW_TAG_variable tag

2008-10-31 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-10-31 19:07 --- Created an attachment (id=16604) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16604action=view) testcase file 3 of 3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37982

[Bug debug/37890] New: Incorrect nesting for DW_TAG_imported_declaration

2008-10-22 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
nesting for DW_TAG_imported_declaration Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com http

[Bug libgcj/30886] Memory collection deadlock

2007-02-22 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2007-02-22 15:11 --- Expected: The collection quota (500 objects) is met and the program exits with a pass Actual; The program hangs before the quota is met. Some times not a single object is collected. This happens more frequently

[Bug libgcj/30886] Memory collection deadlock

2007-02-22 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2007-02-22 15:35 --- Fare enough, I just thought I would bring my test case to your attention. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30886

[Bug java/30886] New: Memory collection deadlock

2007-02-20 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
dot org ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30886

[Bug java/30886] Memory collection deadlock

2007-02-20 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2007-02-20 15:48 --- Created an attachment (id=13075) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13075action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30886

[Bug libgcj/23686] New: path embbeded using -rpath is ignored when handling System.loadLibrary()

2005-09-01 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
System.loadLibrary() Product: gcc Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com

[Bug libgcj/23686] path embbeded using -rpath is ignored when handling System.loadLibrary()

2005-09-01 Thread swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com 2005-09-01 20:40 --- Created an attachment (id=9642) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9642action=view) testcase that produces the bug -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23686