--- Comment #19 from tadhunt at gmail dot com 2010-09-02 16:01 ---
This flamewar in the comments is hilarious.
To all concerned, here is a much simpler example. This does appear to be a
regression. I apologize that I cannot help fix it, as it's a really useful
feature that helps
--- Comment #3 from tadhunt at gmail dot com 2010-09-02 16:08 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Richard, thanks for the confirmation.
This is a great feature that we've come to rely on over the years for catching
rookie errors.
This might not appear in comments very often, but I
: tadhunt at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45493
--- Comment #1 from tadhunt at gmail dot com 2010-09-02 03:42 ---
Same behavior on 4.4.3 4.4.1 (same host, target build)
Forgot to mention:
gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5)
gcc version 4.4.1 (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu9)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45493
