https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654
--- Comment #8 from Hossein Talebi ---
Hi Paul,
Thanks for following up on this. I actually changed my programming language
for this bug, just kidding :-).
Cheers
Hossein
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, 16:05 pault at gcc dot gnu.org <
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: talebi.hossein at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 37572
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37572=edit
the minimalistic test file
Hi,
Compiling the attached file, using gfrotran versions 4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819
--- Comment #23 from Hossein Talebi ---
Thank you also for the great work and such a nice compiler. I should have
actually noticed this a lot sooner but I was trying to keep my code
compiling with gcc 4.8.
> It is comments like the above that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819
--- Comment #18 from Hossein Talebi ---
I am now trying this bug and the Bug 68415 with the new GCC from trunc and it
is fine. Nevertheless, this other code does not compile.
(gcc version 6.0.0 20151129 (experimental))
Module
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: talebi.hossein at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I am now trying bug 61819 and the Bug 68415 with the new GCC from trunk and it
is fine. Nevertheless, this other code does not compile.
(gcc version 6.0.0 20151129 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819
--- Comment #20 from Hossein Talebi ---
I just submitted a new bug. It is a pity that my code cannot be compiled
with gfortran 4.9 and above for more than a year now..
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:01 PM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org <
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: talebi.hossein at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36761
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36761=edit
fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #19 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
Hi,
This patch goes to Gfortran 4.8 or the current version? Thank you.
Cheers
H.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:03 PM, vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #15 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
Hi, will this bug be fixed anytime soon or is it fixed already in GCC4.9?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #9 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
I looked at it in more details by overloading the automatic assignment (=) with
a self written one and I found the problem. This is a minimalistic example
that the program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #10 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
I forgot to say, when I allocate the variables manually and then do assignment,
it works fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #2 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
I tried but I could not get it with a simple test case. It will take me 1-2
full days until I reduce my code to a minimalistic example. I know you GCC guys
don't like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #4 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31574
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31574action=edit
test case, permix.f90 and the external
Please replace the contents of permix.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #6 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
Thank you for trying it. Please spend 5 minutes to read and follow this. I
have attached a zip files in proper folder which you have to overwrite to
your local copy of PERMIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #8 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
Basically it is similar. Below is the output and error message in Ubuntu x64
13.1 using GCC 4.8.1. You get a little more information though.
PERMIX 28 July 2013
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: talebi.hossein at gmail dot com
Hi,
Unfortunetely I could not repeat this with a simpler test example. So this code
below runs fine with Intel compiler but fails with Gfortan
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: talebi.hossein at gmail dot com
Hi there,
I get the segmentation fault on compilation of this code. This compiles with
Intel Fortran Compiler.
module
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493
--- Comment #3 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
Will it be fixed in gfortran 4.8 or 4.9?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
--- Comment #9 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com 2012-06-07
16:03:09 UTC ---
I think I found where the problem is. It is not with the trim(). It is mostly
with read (st_input_all(j),*,IOSTAT=ios) I50(1:50).
I attach a self
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
--- Comment #3 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com 2012-03-11
17:27:42 UTC ---
Hello,
Hummm, a self contained example... That will be possible when I go back to the
office. I can also check it myself with a simpler example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
Bug #: 52537
Summary: slow trim function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
21 matches
Mail list logo
