--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 14:34 ---
Reopening since GCC should not ICE, even if the code is invalid.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 14:35 ---
Reopening.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 10:26 ---
I get the same on x86_64.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC host
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 09:11 ---
Confirmed.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 06:56 ---
Confirmed.
This happens *a lot* when compiling Debian with -O3.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-10 08:34 ---
Seems like we should reopen this bug then.
Aurelien, how big are those patches you're talking about? Are they aimed at
4.3 or only or 4.4?
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-10 08:35 ---
Also confirm the bug.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 21:21 ---
Fixed in SVN by Richard.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 07:32 ---
It's the same.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34138 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 07:32 ---
*** Bug 34179 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 19:16 ---
Works for me with trunk.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31037 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 19:16 ---
*** Bug 31080 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 21:31 ---
Confirmed.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:08 ---
I can confirm this with FSF gcc 4.1.3 20070902
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:26 ---
This happens with 4.0 - 4.3. gcc 3.4 didn't have the -msym32 option.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=14149)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14149action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256
--- Comment #6 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-25 09:37 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30840 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-25 09:37 ---
*** Bug 32607 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30840
--- Comment #6 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-25 09:37 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30840 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-25 09:37 ---
*** Bug 31926 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30840
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
GCC target
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 09:07 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30840 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 09:07 ---
*** Bug 31926 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-17 11:37 ---
I just saw this again with 20070515 r124745.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Keywords||ice-on-valid
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 18:23 ---
Confirmed, still there as of 4.1.3 20070420.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 18:27 ---
isn't this a duplicate of 29443?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 17:59 ---
Confirmed.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 18:09 ---
Testcase:
namespace std
{
template class T class allocator
{
public:typedef T value_type;
typedef long unsigned int size_type;
~allocator ()
{
}
};
template class charT struct
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 18:09 ---
This also happens with 4.3. I cannot check 4.0.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 15:29 ---
I've seen it on x86_64 and ia64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31391
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 10:56 ---
Sorry for the bad communication.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31364 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 10:56 ---
*** Bug 31371 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 15:18 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31138 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 15:18 ---
*** Bug 31372 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-18 12:47 ---
Confirmed.
20070303 works.
20070318 fails.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-05 13:11 ---
confirmed with GCC 4.3.0 20070303. 4.2.0 works.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-04 01:35 ---
I see this on x86_64 and ia64 too.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 17:11 ---
I just verified that this is still there in 4.1 so I'm reopening the bug.
I know that no progress has been made but it _is_ still a bug in 4.1, which
unlike 4.0 is still supported.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 17:12 ---
Reopen
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 17:17 ---
Janis, do you think you could check what fixed this on the 4.2 branch?
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-24 12:01 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Given that this is not user-visible in released compilers and won't very
likely lead to wrong code, I propose to mark it WONTFIX for 4.0 and 4.1.
Speaking as the submitter, I don't mind
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
GCC build
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 18:56 ---
This also happens on amd64. Segfaults with 4.0 and 4.1, works with 3.4 and
4.2.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 18:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=12486)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12486action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29584
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 19:02 ---
(gdb) where
#0 expand_case (exp=Variable exp is not available.
) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/stmt.c:2106
#1 0x00533ee7 in expand_expr_real_1 (exp=Variable exp is not
available.
) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-09 11:46 ---
Confirmed. gcc 3.4 and 4.2 work, 4.0 and 4.1 fail.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 13:37 ---
This doesn't happen with gcc 4.2, nor, apparently, with 4.0.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29059
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 11:59 ---
(sid)451:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-g++ -c pr29016.cc
(sid)452:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-g++ -c -O pr29016.cc
pr29016.cc:16: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 07:05 ---
Confirmed. Also happens with 4.2.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 09:38 ---
Reduced testcase:
struct w49
{
union
{
}
value;
};
f9887 (struct w49 a23040)
{
unsigned r9887;
if (((struct structure_type24753 *) (r9887 - 1)) == ((void *) 0))
{
backtrace (stalin.sc, 7222
--- Comment #17 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 18:53 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared
I'll try to get around it as soon as I can. Thanks.
It has been a month... would be nice if you could
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 18:56 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Jim, were you going to check this in or did you need some more testing on
it?
I haven't had time to test it yet.
Any update on this, Jim?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 05:42 ---
What error did you get? Can you please paste the error message.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28815
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 05:56 ---
And please consult http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28815
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 23:01 ---
This works for me with gcc 4.2.0 20060810 or 4.2.0 20060819 and binutils
2.17-2. Can you try to downgrade binutils to see if it works then?
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 23:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=12100)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12100action=view)
test case
Testcase from application ser.
Fails on x86_64 with: gcc -ftree-vectorize -O -c
Fails on x86 with: gcc
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 12:05 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24367 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 12:05 ---
*** Bug 28717 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 11:53 ---
*** Bug 28676 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28672
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 11:53 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28672 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 12:00 ---
-O3 works here while -O2 fails - but, in any case, confirmed.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 12:02 ---
I was on gcc 4.2 btw.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 19:37 ---
(gdb) run -O2 tt.cc
Starting program: /usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.0/cc1plus -O2
tt.cc
bar* testcase()
Analyzing compilation unitPerforming intraprocedural optimizations
Assembling functions:
bar
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 19:42 ---
Fails with 4.0 and 4.1, works with 3.4 and 4.2.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 19:49 ---
{
__inline double fabs (double __x) throw ()
{
}
typedef struct
{
}
*__locale_t;
extern void exit (int __status) throw () __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
}
void
nrerror (char error_text[])
{
exit (1
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 20:18 ---
Further reduced:
double fabs (double __x) { }
extern void exit (int __status);
void
nrerror (void)
{
exit(0);
}
float
betacf (float x)
{
void nrerror (void);
float d, h;
d = 1.0 - x;
if (fabs (d) 1.0e-30
--- Comment #7 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 20:44 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I bet this was fixed by the patch which fixed PR 26757 finnally (comment #28).
I can confirm this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28677
--- Comment #8 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 20:51 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
I bet this was fixed by the patch which fixed PR 26757 finnally (comment
#28).
I can confirm this.
Jakub, can you apply your patch for PR 26757 to 4.0 and 4.1
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-08 20:50 ---
Confirmed.
test::TestDescriptionT test::TestDescriptionT::operator=(const
test::TestDescriptionT)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00477cd3 in min_vis_r (tp=value optimized out
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 13:41 ---
This has been fixed already, both in GCC's SVN and in Debian's gcc-4.1 package.
The reason you see it on HPPA is that recent version of gcc-4.1 in Debian don't
build. This bug was fixed in -9 but hppa still has -8
--- Comment #16 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 13:41 ---
*** Bug 28620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 14:23 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Subject: Bug 26827
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115969
Log:
2006-08-06 Paolo Bonzini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR target/26827
* config/i386/i386.md: Add
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 08:36 ---
Confirmed.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 11:34 ---
I can confirm this on i386 with 4.0.4 20060804.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 13:50 ---
This is a duplicate of PR28016, which has been fixed already. What version of
the compiler are you using exactly?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28599
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 15:10 ---
Has been fixed in Debian and upstream already. Please talk to your vendor.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28016 ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #15 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 15:10 ---
*** Bug 28599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
83 matches
Mail list logo
