[Bug target/77904] [ARM Cortex-M0] Frame pointer thrashes registers if assembly statements with "sp" clobber are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77904 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2016-10-10

[Bug target/77904] [ARM Cortex-M0] Frame pointer thrashes registers if assembly statements with "sp" clobber are used

||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fail||7.0 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme --- I can reproduce the behavior mentioned on trunk.

[Bug testsuite/77710] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77710 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) > With GCC 7.0.0 20160927 configured with --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --target=arm-none-eabi I get the expected output > (below).

[Bug testsuite/77713] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77713 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Test now builds but execution shows a few FAIL: FAIL: test_d_i:266: "%hhi" expected result for "-16657" doesn't match function call return value: 6 not in [1, 4] FAIL: test_d_i:267: "%hhu" expected

[Bug testsuite/77710] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77710 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > I think this failure may have been inadvertently introduced in r240434. The > failure should be gone now that r240442 has been checked in to adjust the >

[Bug rtl-optimization/77714] [7 Regression] Wrong code generation for gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51447.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77714 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Hi Bernd & Peter, Yes the code is still failing on today's trunk. I tested both patch you propose Bernd and both seems to work. Thanks a lot for such a quick fix!

[Bug rtl-optimization/77714] New: Wrong code generation for gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51447.c

Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: bergner at vnet dot ibm.com Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-linux-gnu Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, GCC

[Bug middle-end/77713] New: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c compilation failed to produce executable

: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-linux-gnu Target: arm-none-eabi Hi

[Bug testsuite/77710] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c

: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-linux-gnu Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c fails

[Bug middle-end/77709] New: specified destination size warning does not work when cross-compiling from 64 host to 32bit target

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-linux-gnu Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, gcc.dg/tree-ssa

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in cselib_record_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||6.2.1 --- Comment #5 from Thomas

[Bug target/71607] [5/6/7 Regression] [ARM] ice due to forbidden enabled attribute dependency on instruction operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #6 from Thomas

[Bug target/71607] [5/6/7 Regression] [ARM] ice due to forbidden enabled attribute dependency on instruction operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Christophe Monat from comment #4) > (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #3) > > Thomas, Hi Christophe, > > I am seeing that the assignee name has been reset : does it mean that

[Bug tree-optimization/76957] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/scop-dsyr2k.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "number of SCoPs

IRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Created attachment

[Bug testsuite/72840] PASS->NA: 20_util/ratio/cons/cons_overflow_neg.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72840 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Mon Aug 15 09:14:15 2016 New Revision: 239463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239463=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-15 Thomas Preud'homme PR

[Bug testsuite/72850] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69270-3.c scan-tree-dump-times uncprop1 ", 1" 4

ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Created attachment 39086

[Bug middle-end/71078] x/abs(x) -> sign(1.0,x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71078] x/abs(x) -> sign(1.0,x)

||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Hi, The following tests are still failing for me on arm-none-eabi targets: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71078-1.c scan-tree-dump forwprop1

[Bug testsuite/72841] New: PASS->NA: 20_util/tuple/cons/66338.cc execution test

P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, r238945 has changed the following two tests from runtime tests to compile t

[Bug testsuite/72840] New: PASS->NA: 20_util/ratio/cons/cons_overflow_neg.cc

ent: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hi, 2 error checks have stopped being run in 20_util/ratio/cons/cons_overflow_neg.cc due to syntax error on the dg-er

[Bug testsuite/72838] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-cast.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72838 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Note, the same error happens in: PASS->NA: g++.dg/warn/overflow-warn-3.C -std=gnu++11 const (test for errors, line 67) PASS->FAIL: g++.dg/warn/overflow-warn-3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

[Bug testsuite/72838] New: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-cast.C

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-cast.C fails on arm-none-eabi on the dg-error at line 8: NA->FAIL

[Bug lto/69866] lto1: internal compiler error: in add_symbol_to_partition_1, at lto/lto-partition.c:158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.3.0 |7.0 --- Comment #7 from Thomas

[Bug lto/69866] lto1: internal compiler error: in add_symbol_to_partition_1, at lto/lto-partition.c:158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||5.4.1, 6.1.1, 7.0 --- Comment #6

[Bug lto/69866] lto1: internal compiler error: in add_symbol_to_partition_1, at lto/lto-partition.c:158

||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- I can indeed reproduce that bug with latest gcc-5-branch either by compiling the below testcase, or by building ChibiOS 3.0.4 as described in https://answers.launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/+question

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in cselib_record_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Jul 14 16:41:06 2016 New Revision: 238346 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238346=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-14 Thomas Preud'homme gcc/

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in cselib_record_set

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |5.5 Summary|ICE in |ICE in cselib_record_set Known to fail||5.4.1 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Hi

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Created attachment 38902 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38902=edit Testcase allowing to reproduce ICE in cselib

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] New: ICE in

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: ---

[Bug tree-optimization/60172] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ARM performance regression from trunk@207239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60172 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/71707] [7 Regression] ICE in get_stridx_plus_constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71707 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/71715] FAIL: 23_containers/deque/modifiers/swap/2.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71715 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71715] New: FAIL: 23_containers/deque/modifiers/swap/2.cc (test for excess errors)

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-linux-gnu Target: arm-none-eabi Hi

[Bug target/71607] [5/6/7 Regression] [ARM] ice due to forbidden enabled attribute dependency on instruction operands

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/71607] [5/6/7 Regression] [ARM] ice due to forbidden enabled attribute dependency on instruction operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/71490] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Differences start at sink phase: @@ -46,17 +56,17 @@ f (int s, int * c) _2 = a1.0_1 * 4; _3 = -_2; x1_14 = c_13(D) + _3; - a2_15 = s_11(D) * 4; - a2.1_4 = (unsigned int) a2_15; - _5 =

[Bug tree-optimization/71490] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/71081] experimental/memory_resource/1.cc run for targets without atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71081 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Fri May 20 12:36:57 2016 New Revision: 236507 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236507=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Thomas Preud'homme PR

[Bug libstdc++/71081] New: experimental/memory_resource/1.cc run for targets without atomics

Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, experimental/memory_resource/1.cc test

[Bug testsuite/70553] pr70496.c should exclude Thumb only targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70553 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #2) > Fixed then ? Yes, sorry.

[Bug testsuite/70553] pr70496.c should exclude Thumb only targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70553 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Apr 7 16:19:20 2016 New Revision: 234811 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234811=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-07 Thomas Preud'homme

[Bug testsuite/70553] New: pr70496.c should exclude Thumb only targets

: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi gcc.target/arm/pr70496.c fails with the following error when targeting Cortex-M3

[Bug target/70232] [6 regression] excessive stack usage with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > The bswap pass could learn to split this up into two loads and bswaps and > combine the results with a single shift and or. I'll add it to the bswap TODO

[Bug testsuite/70227] New: pr69589 does not check for -rdynamic availability

: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi g++.dg/lto/pr69589 fails on trunk for arm-none-eabi target with the following error: unrecognized command line option '-rdynamic

[Bug target/63503] [AArch64] A57 executes fused multiply-add poorly in some situations

||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #26 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Fixed as of r222512

[Bug tree-optimization/69196] [5/6 Regression] code size regression with jump threading at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/69586] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-21.c for target defaulting to short enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69586 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Thanks!

[Bug testsuite/69586] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-21.c for target defaulting to short enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69586 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Hi Richard, Any progress on this?

[Bug testsuite/69076] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-28.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69076 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug testsuite/68632] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837 c_lto_pr65837_0.o assemble, -flto -mfpu=neon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68632 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69764] [5 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in decompose, at rtl.h:2107)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69764 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/69586] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-21.c for target defaulting to short enum

Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: rguenther at suse dot de Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Created attachment 37537 --> https://gcc.gnu.

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Jan 21 08:29:28 2016 New Revision: 232664 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232664=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-21 Thomas Preud'homme Backport

[Bug testsuite/69406] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/linkage.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69406 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- It does indeed. Thanks

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Doh, I should have caught that earlier. The bug can be seen in: % grep -c dg-option special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc 3 Using dg-additional-option for the timeout solves the issue.

[Bug testsuite/69406] New: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/linkage.cc (test for excess errors)

Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi 17_intro/headers/c++2011/linkage.cc fails on arm

[Bug tree-optimization/69378] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Sadly no, it didn't.

[Bug tree-optimization/69378] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme --- This patch works for me on this testcase.

[Bug testsuite/69371] New: UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: 3dw4rd at verizon dot net, CaptainSifff at gmx dot de, redi

[Bug tree-optimization/69378] New: FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: rguenther at suse dot de Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Created attachment 37400 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37400=edit D

[Bug tree-optimization/69380] New: FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr69336.C scan-tree-dump-not optimized "cmap"

ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: rguenther at suse dot de Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Created attachment 37402

[Bug libstdc++/69340] New: Incorrect use of standard try catch in libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-stdexcept.cc

: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, libstdc++ fails to build on arm-none-eabi with -fno-exceptions: libstdc++-v3

[Bug libstdc++/69190] FAIL: experimental/type_erased_allocator/uses_allocator.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69190 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- It is indeed. Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Fri Jan 8 09:21:19 2016 New Revision: 232154 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232154=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-08 Thomas Preud'homme gcc/

[Bug libstdc++/69190] New: FAIL: experimental/type_erased_allocator/uses_allocator.cc

Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Commit r232129 causes the following fail on arm-none-eabi target: FAIL: experimental

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- It does fix it for arm-none-eabi targets, the test is now unsupported. I should have done it myself. Jakub was talking about moving it in the cilk-plus directory. Do you think it's still necessary?

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Yes, sorry. I had finished bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and regression testsuite on both that and arm-none-eabi but I wanted to do a bootstrap on a big endian system. I then got caught up by holidays.

[Bug testsuite/69076] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-28.c

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, gcc.dg/graphite/id-28.c fails on arm-none-eabi targets with: xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-pthread' The test is missing a pthread

[Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/61441] ARM aarch64 fails to quiet signaling NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/68810] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C -- test for errors -- -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68810 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/68820] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memops-asm.c execution, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

-*-*, |x86_64-apple-darwin14 |x86_64-apple-darwin14, ||arm-none-eabi CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme --- arm-none-eabi as well.

[Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #56 from Thomas Preud'homme --- My apologize, this is actually already reported as PR68913

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Dec 17 08:43:48 2015 New Revision: 231745 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231745=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-17 Thomas Preud'homme Revert:

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme --- I have a patch that seems to be working. Running regression testing and bootstrap now.

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Looking more into find_bswap_or_nop, it became clear that the rsize loop is fine for both endianness because it operates on the result of the expression being analyzed and that result lies in register.

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Hi Christophe, Could you paste the output of arm linux when compiling the testcase in cilkplus effective target with -fcilkplus?

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme --- The exact place where it goes wrong is in find_bswap_or_nop (not the _1 helper function) in the following line: for (tmpn = n->n, rsize = 0; tmpn; tmpn >>= BITS_PER_MARKER, rsize++); This code

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme --- So after performing the symbolic computation, the result is: 0x04030201 with 01 being the byte represented by b. This is correct so far and n->range shows 5 since 5 bytes have been touched. However, the

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Mon Dec 14 02:05:16 2015 New Revision: 231605 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231605=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-14 Thomas Preud'homme PR

[Bug testsuite/68632] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837 c_lto_pr65837_0.o assemble, -flto -mfpu=neon

||2015-12-08 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

||2015-12-08 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug testsuite/67948] xor-and.c needs updating after r228661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67948 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Fri Dec 4 08:36:07 2015 New Revision: 231249 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231249=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-04 Andre Vieira Backport

[Bug testsuite/68629] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, When cross-compiling forarm-none-eabi targets with current trunk, attr-simd-3.c fails with: xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option

[Bug testsuite/68632] New: FAIL: gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837 c_lto_pr65837_0.o assemble, -flto -mfpu=neon

: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi Hi, The patch fixing this PR65837 added a new test in gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/68185] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Things start to go awry in the get_defs called at the end of make_defs_and_copies_lists for conditional move in ree.c. ree correctly detect that insn 308 is a conditional move and do the transitive

[Bug rtl-optimization/68185] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Here's a quick update. What I found so far is that after split2, we have: (insn 148 61 304 16 (set (reg:CCNO 17 flags) (compare:CCNO (reg:HI 44 r15 [orig:91 pretmp_9 ] [91])

[Bug rtl-optimization/68185] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/59593] [arm big-endian] using "ldrh" access a immediate which stored in a memory by word

||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Fixed in all supported releases.

[Bug testsuite/67959] New: "width of 'code' exceeds its type" error in ssa-thread-13

ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org CC: law at redhat dot com Target Milestone: --- By declaring the field "code" in struct rtx_def ssa-thread-13 assumes that

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] [6 Regression] Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Was this maybe fixed by > > 2015-10-13 Richard Sandiford > > * real.h (real_isinteger): Declare. > * real.c

[Bug testsuite/67948] New: xor-and.c needs updating after r228661

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: arm-none-eabi After r228661, gcc.target/arm/xor-and is nicely optimized from: ldr r3, .L2 eorsr0, r3 lsrsr0, r0, #1 movsr3, #128 lslsr3

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/66828] [5/6 Regression] gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c:2182:38: runtime error: left shift of 72057594037927936 by 8 places cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66828 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: thopre01 Date: Tue Aug 11 07:58:07 2015 New Revision: 226775 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226775root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-08-11 Thomas Preud'homme

[Bug tree-optimization/66828] [5/6 Regression] gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c:2182:38: runtime error: left shift of 72057594037927936 by 8 places cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66828 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sure. Starting bootstrap and testing.

[Bug debug/67043] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67043 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: thopre01 Date: Tue Aug 4 02:11:58 2015 New Revision: 226540 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226540root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-08-04 Thomas Preud'homme

[Bug debug/67043] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67043 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Mmmh, that seems to be because luid are not up-to-date. Running df_recompute_luids before can_move_invariant_reg makes the issue go away.

[Bug debug/67043] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67043 Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

<    1   2   3   4   5   >