[Bug rtl-optimization/71496] Two picbase loads created for libjava code on powerpc-darwin after rev 228022.

2017-03-27 Thread tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496 Tobias Netzel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tobias.netzel at googlemail dot co

[Bug objc/55572] New: -fobjc-direct-dispatch is not really implemented

2012-12-03 Thread tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55572 Bug #: 55572 Summary: -fobjc-direct-dispatch is not really implemented Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString

2011-09-08 Thread tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #25 from Tobias Netzel tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com 2011-09-08 16:27:21 UTC --- As for me the patch does what it is expected to do; no more linker warnings when linking objective-c code. I didn't notice anything that might

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString

2011-07-20 Thread tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #15 from Tobias Netzel tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com 2011-07-20 20:51:12 UTC --- Created attachment 24800 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24800 sample objective-c code that still causes the warning Said

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString

2011-07-20 Thread tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 Tobias Netzel tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString

2011-07-20 Thread tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #19 from Tobias Netzel tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com 2011-07-20 21:53:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) Iain, I'm thinking we should do your code unconditionally for darwin10 and later. In darwin10.h, we put: To me