https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107191
--- Comment #2 from Bruce Adams ---
Also tried with gcc 12.1
>g++-12 --version
g++-12 (Ubuntu 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) 12.1.0
```
/usr/bin/g++-12 -fmodules-ts -std=gnu++20 -MD -MT
CMakeFiles/gccice.dir/Foo.cpp.o -MF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107192
--- Comment #1 from Bruce Adams ---
Still occurs if I use gcc 12.1
>g++-12 --version
g++-12 (Ubuntu 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) 12.1.0
```
[ 50%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/gccice.dir/Bar.cpp.o
/usr/bin/g++-12 -fmodules-ts -std=gnu++20 -MD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107191
--- Comment #1 from Bruce Adams ---
I also produced a different segfault while trying to reproduce this - see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107192
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 53682
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53682=edit
Sample code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99769
--- Comment #4 from Bruce Adams ---
I had a issue I believed to be related but in attempting to create a reproducer
got several different ICEs so I have submitted a separate ticket - see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107191
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 53681
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #2 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk ---
Running configure using --disable-libcilkrts (in addition to
--disable-libsanitiser) which is not documented results in a useable gcc 4.9.1
(with c++ working but presumably cilk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #3 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk ---
Running configure using --disable-libcilkrts (in addition to
--disable-libsanitiser) which is not documented results in a useable gcc 4.9.1
(with c++ working but presumably cilk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61956
--- Comment #2 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk ---
I have tried using a newer binutils (2.24) either installed before attempting
to build gcc or in a combined tree build.
The combined tree build complains that binutils/bfd
: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc 4.9.0 fails to compile on a standard Red Hat 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #1 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk ---
configuring with --disable-libsantizer progresses the build but it fails later
on linking cilk. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61956
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
Following on from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
I tried compiling gcc4.9 on RHEL4 using configure --disable-libsanitizer.
It progresses the build which subsequently fails when linking cilk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #129 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-11-29
10:49:08 UTC ---
doh! You are entirely right. It works just fine on the 2019 snapshot.
Sorry for wasting time there. I was too fast on the email trigger. Mea culpa.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #127 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-11-26
12:10:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #126)
201103 of course.
Perhaps it is my misunderstanding. I assume __cpluscplus is defined by the
compiler. Could it come from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tortoise_74
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51294
Bug #: 51294
Summary: spurious warning from -Wconversion in C and C++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51294
--- Comment #1 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-11-24
11:35:24 UTC ---
Probably unncessary but the OS is RHEL5 on a 32bit machine.
brucea@:home/brucea/spuriouslsb_release -a
LSB Version:
:core-4.0-ia32:core-4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51294
--- Comment #4 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-11-24
17:09:56 UTC ---
Shouldn't integral conversion rules apply if the types of the second and third
arguments to a conditional expression differ.
So zero should be converted
18 matches
Mail list logo
