||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Nathan applied a workaround in trunk r239836
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77458
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77458
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Wed Oct 19 10:48:46 2016
New Revision: 241338
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241338=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR lto/77458] Avoid ICE in offloading with differing _FloatN, _FloatNx types
|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > > Well, must be another missing BB_VISITED clearin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Thomas
|ASSIGNED
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I'll have a look later today, but if someone is able to do so now
: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
If you enable gcc/lto-streamer.h:LTO_STREAMER_DEBUG, the
libgomp.fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74600
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74600
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
s: openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As of the PR32187 comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74600
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: nvptx
As of GCC trunk r239356 "Replace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|cesar at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to cesar from comment #4)
> I could be mistaken, but I don't think there's anything we can do about that
> test case because fortran doesn't have file scope. Specifically, in your
> example,
>
>
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Confirmed. Probably Dominique's x86_64-apple-darwin15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 39064
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39064=edit
Fortran routine directive with a name
Cesar, thanks for your initial fix.
Please have a look at the new file I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Perhaps similar to PR70550, I found another case of -Wuninitialized false
positives in OpenMP
||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|fortran |middle-end
Assignee|tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org |cltang at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
We've gotten that aspect of the OpenACC specification clarified
: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39028
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71959
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, steven at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: nvptx
Testing gfortran.dg for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71535
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
||2016-06-29
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
The is the OpenACC variant of OpenMP's PR71535.
You need to add "#pragma acc routine" fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon Jun 13 16:37:29 2016
New Revision: 237386
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237386=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR middle-end/71373] Document missing OMP_CLAUSE_* in gcc/tree-nested.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71520
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 38681
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38681=edit
Document missing OMP_CLAUSE_* in gcc/tree-nested.c
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment
|NEW
Assignee|tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Fixed OpenACC clauses handling on trunk in r237291, gcc-6-branch in r237296,
and gomp-4_0-branch in r237300.
>From a quick look it appe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
Bug 71373 depends on bug 71381, which changed state.
Bug 71381 Summary: C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Jun 10 10:12:36 2016
New Revision: 237300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237300=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Jun 10 10:12:22 2016
New Revision: 237299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237299=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Jun 10 09:46:18 2016
New Revision: 237296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237296=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Jun 10 09:46:04 2016
New Revision: 237295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237295=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Jun 10 09:22:51 2016
New Revision: 237291
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237291=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Jun 10 09:22:38 2016
New Revision: 237290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237290=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65095
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
We don't handle several OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63859
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65567
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon May 23 14:54:04 2016
New Revision: 236594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236594=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR libffi/65567] libffi: Fix, and simply libffi_feature_test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65567
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon May 23 15:00:41 2016
New Revision: 236595
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236595=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR libffi/65567] libffi: Fix, and simply libffi_feature_test
Backport trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65567
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon May 23 15:03:08 2016
New Revision: 236596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236596=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR libffi/65567] libffi: Fix, and simply libffi_feature_test
Backport trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38484|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70738
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70860
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue May 17 16:08:37 2016
New Revision: 236326
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236326=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR target/70860] [nvptx] Handle NULL cfun in nvptx_libcall_value
Backport
||2016-05-13
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 38484
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38484=e
: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, openmp
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I'm running
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71071
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|7.0 |6.2
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
In
<http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C2b4f59d5-be38-2814-27bb-73aa7ffb4b8f%40codesourcery.com%3E>,
Chung-Lin has now posted a patch (p
,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I had a cursory look at that one. Differently from PR70857, the ICE triggers
here the second time
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I had a cursory look at this. The ICE with
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/gridify-1.f90 occurs for "-fopenacc -fopenm
iority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Blo
||jnorris at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jnorris at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge
, openmp
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
It has been established that for offloading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to cesar from comment #2)
> Furthermore, as Thomas mentioned, gcc-6 does not automatically assign
> parallelism to loops inside parallel regions.
:-) GCC 6.1 does do that that.
> Consequently,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70860
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon May 2 11:25:17 2016
New Revision: 235748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235748=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR target/70860] [nvptx] Handle NULL cfun in nvptx_libcall_value
|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed||2016-05-02
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org,
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge
target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: nvptx
The r235511 c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70828
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51153
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68242
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgomp |testsuite
Assignee|nathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70626
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
||2016-04-11
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70598
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
Component: fortran
Assignee: cltang at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As once reported in
<http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C87r3j4lcrd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70580
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70579
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70579
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Apr 8 08:31:40 2016
New Revision: 234823
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234823=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR testsuite/70579, PR testsuite/70580] Fix test cases failing because of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70580
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Apr 8 08:31:40 2016
New Revision: 234823
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234823=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR testsuite/70579, PR testsuite/70580] Fix test cases failing because of
||2016-04-08
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2016-04-08
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
PASSes in trunk.
: openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
PASSes in trunk.
|5.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|jnorris at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
In r234806 now also fixed on gcc-5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69414
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Thu Apr 7 11:43:30 2016
New Revision: 234806
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234806=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR libgomp/69414] Fix handling of subarrays with update directive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org |cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 38200
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38200=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
|tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to iverbin from comment #2)
> Actually, only 3 tests require 2+ workers (they fail with export
> CILK_NWORKERS=1):
> FAIL: c-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64177
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue Mar 29 14:39:33 2016
New Revision: 234523
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234523=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR testsuite/64177] Audit Cilk Plus tests for CILK_NWORKERS=1
PR
||2016-03-29
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69414
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Sorry for the late answer. Thanks for reporting this, together with a test
case, and a patch. Already fixed on gomp-4_0-branch, as you've found, and now
requested for trunk inclusion:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64748
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70289
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70009
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
Component|libgomp
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org, vries at gcc dot gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
As I understand it, the issue is that when using a copyout(pi) clause, the
value
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Found in the course of PR69858. Consider:
int f(void)
{
int x
Keywords: openmp
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: hsa
Assignee: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
With hsa
|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2016-01-23
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jnorris at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Isn't it a gccgo front end (spec) bug, that it doesn't bring in GOMP stuff
(builtins, link against libgomp) under the presence of
"-ftree-parallelize-loops=2"? Cf. gcc/gcc.c:GOMP_SELF_SPECS.
801 - 900 of 1005 matches
Mail list logo
