https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108861
--- Comment #5 from Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira ---
> Because there is an open defect report against the C++ standard about this.
> Basically until that is resolved, GCC's behavior is considered correct.
How clueless of me to miss such
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108861
--- Comment #2 from Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira ---
> Isn't this just Bug 98449? Why did you close that as FIXED?
Nobody is going to fix 98449. The ONE-line patchset fixing the issue was there
for YEARS. Why does it take so many years to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98449
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108861
Bug ID: 108861
Summary: notify_all_at_thread_exit() should notify on cond
while lock is held to avoid a race
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98449
--- Comment #3 from Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira ---
LLVM's libcxx already applied this 1-line patchset:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64fc3cd55d586498dd21c5b3cfaa755793913772
Can we have the same here on GCC side (I've already
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108859
Bug ID: 108859
Summary: Exception thrown by std::filesystem::copy() is wrong
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98449
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vini.ipsmaker at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98449
Bug ID: 98449
Summary: notify_all_at_thread_exit() should notify on cond
while lock is held to avoid a race
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
