[Bug c++/100850] [coroutine] Wrong addresses of variables captured by reference into lambda co-routines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100850 --- Comment #5 from Vlad --- > Can this be closed then? Sure. Thanks you very much! For the history, before it's closed I'd like to leave this reference:

[Bug c++/100850] [coroutine] Wrong addresses of variables captured by reference into lambda co-routines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100850 --- Comment #3 from Vlad --- My bad. It's actually a UB. The lambda lifetime is just over by the moment of resumption of the co-routine.

[Bug c++/100850] [coroutine] Wrong addresses of variables captured by reference into lambda co-routines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100850 --- Comment #2 from Vlad --- Yet another piece -- appears with -O2/-O3/-Os. -O0/-O1 is free from this bug.

[Bug c++/100850] [coroutine] Wrong addresses of variables captured by reference into lambda co-routines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100850 --- Comment #1 from Vlad --- Forgot to mention... It seems to be a regression -- gcc 10.2 and 10.3 don't demonstrate the issue on this example.

[Bug c++/100850] New: [coroutine] Wrong addresses of variables captured by reference into lambda co-routines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100850 Bug ID: 100850 Summary: [coroutine] Wrong addresses of variables captured by reference into lambda co-routines. Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED