[Bug fortran/114611] New: H edit descriptor should flag as error with -std-f95 (or higher)

2024-04-05 Thread w6ws at earthlink dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114611 Bug ID: 114611 Summary: H edit descriptor should flag as error with -std-f95 (or higher) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77504] [11/12/13/14 Regression] "is used uninitialized" with allocatable string and array constructors

2024-02-23 Thread w6ws at earthlink dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504 Walter Spector changed: What|Removed |Added CC||w6ws at earthlink dot net --- Comment

[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save

2024-01-23 Thread w6ws at earthlink dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360 --- Comment #9 from Walter Spector --- It appears that Lfortran issues a message for this case. See: https://github.com/j3-fortran/fortran_proposals/issues/83#issuecomment-1906266587

[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save

2024-01-21 Thread w6ws at earthlink dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360 --- Comment #8 from Walter Spector --- Hi, It is a good point. The message is helpful when issued within a procedure. At module scope, it doesn't mean much since everything at that level is SAVE anyway. This is similar to what happens in C:

[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save

2024-01-20 Thread w6ws at earthlink dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360 --- Comment #5 from Walter Spector --- IMHO this should be a "surprising" warning when -Wsurprising is specified. The message should suggest adding an explicit SAVE attribute to make the code clear.