https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93642
--- Comment #2 from Wesley Shillingford ---
Not sure if I can edit my comment, but just realised the #include in the
original comment should be #include not #include . The
attachments are fine though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93642
--- Comment #1 from Wesley Shillingford ---
Created attachment 47806
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47806&action=edit
Original file showing the issue
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wezrule at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47805
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93161
--- Comment #4 from Wesley Shillingford ---
Great, thanks for the confirmation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93161
--- Comment #2 from Wesley Shillingford ---
Thanks for the swift reply.
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> That paper is more than two years old. The current working draft does
> specify the equality operators, e.g. [cmp.strongord]
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wezrule at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following compiles fine with gcc (on godbolt gcc trunk):
int x{2};
int y{2};
auto s = x <=> y;
s == std::strong_ordering:
