https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101865
--- Comment #14 from wschmidt at linux dot ibm.com ---
On 8/31/21 11:09 AM, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101865
>
> --- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
> (In reply to Tulio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95737
--- Comment #4 from wschmidt at linux dot ibm.com ---
On 6/19/20 12:43 PM, jens.seifert at de dot ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95737
>
> Jens Seifert changed:
>
> W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
--- Comment #35 from wschmidt at linux dot ibm.com ---
Hi Jeff,
Just a quick comment. We should never discuss raw runtimes of SPEC
benchmarks on Power hardware in public. It's okay to talk about
improvements (>12% in this case), but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #24 from wschmidt at linux dot ibm.com ---
On 5/14/20 12:08 PM, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
>
> --- Comment #23 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Thu, May 14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90763
--- Comment #1 from wschmidt at linux dot ibm.com ---
Hi Martin,
Could you please CC me on all ppc bugs as well as Segher? I do all of
the "project management" activities for the IBM GCC team.
Thanks!
Bill
On 2/6/20 8:28 AM, mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
--- Comment #10 from wschmidt at linux dot ibm.com ---
On 7/31/19 2:25 AM, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
>
> --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> On Wed, 31 Jul 201
