[Bug target/41424] Optimized x86_64-w64 -O1 -foptimize-sibling-calls binary produces negative effects

2009-09-24 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-09-24 13:11 --- vlc's bug. -- xxcv07 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/41424] Optimized x86_64-w64 -O1 -foptimize-sibling-calls binary produces negative effects

2009-09-23 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-09-23 09:29 --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_overflow ? This bug is worse then I thought it is still occurring after -fno-optimize-sibling-calls and less frequent and like a race condition right after seek is done to avi with idx

[Bug target/41424] Optimized x86_64-w64 -O1 -foptimize-sibling-calls binary produces negative effects

2009-09-23 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-09-23 09:44 --- Still unreproducible inside gdb can someone tell me why? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41424

[Bug target/41424] Optimized x86_64-w64 -O1 -foptimize-sibling-calls binary produces negative effects

2009-09-23 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
-- xxcv07 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41424

[Bug target/41424] Optimized x86_64-w64 -O1 -foptimize-sibling-calls binary produces negative effects

2009-09-23 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-09-23 11:56 --- I wish I can do that but I'm testing it under Vista x64 on Windows. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41424

[Bug target/41424] Heavily optimized x86_64-w64 binary produces negative effects

2009-09-22 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-09-22 12:28 --- I am reopening this bug based on that I have retested and recompiled using gcc-trunk which leads to trying to reduce to the exact optimization flag which was causing this problem. As you can see the gdb output above

[Bug target/41424] Heavily optimized x86_64-w64 binary produces negative effects

2009-09-21 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-09-21 10:25 --- Looks like I may have made a mistake in compiling a library which was causing this issue, will report back later. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41424

[Bug target/41424] Heavily optimized x86_64-w64 binary produces negative effects

2009-09-21 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-09-21 10:47 --- Sorry about this invalid report, my mistake in building ffmpeg. -- xxcv07 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/41424] New: Heavily optimized x86_64-w64 binary produces negative effects

2009-09-20 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: xxcv07 at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i486-slackware-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-w64-mingw32 GCC target

[Bug c/41184] wrong optimise code, epilogue code adjust wrong rsp before pop

2009-08-29 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-08-29 09:33 --- Hi, I built an x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross compiler under x86_64 linux using latest gcc SVN code, then use this cross compiler to build ffmpeg. I can confirm this issue and encountered this problem after cross compiled

[Bug c/41184] wrong optimise code, epilogue code adjust wrong rsp before pop

2009-08-29 Thread xxcv07 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-08-29 16:06 --- Thanks Kai, I can confirm it is now fixed, -O1 and up isn't an issue now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41184