[Bug c++/53585] template value parameter of pointer-to-member type incorrectly rejects non-direct values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53585 --- Comment #2 from Simon Hill yacwroy at gmail dot com 2012-06-06 16:43:41 UTC --- Thats... really odd but OK. I guess I read it as you do, the key words being expressed as. I wonder whether that was the intent, and if so, what their rationale

[Bug c++/53585] New: template value parameter of pointer-to-member type incorrectly rejects non-direct values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53585 Bug #: 53585 Summary: template value parameter of pointer-to-member type incorrectly rejects non-direct values Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/48537] New: C++0x: ICE using union with non-trivial member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537 Summary: C++0x: ICE using union with non-trivial member Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/45114] implement C++0x alias-declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45114 --- Comment #4 from Simon Hill yacwroy at gmail dot com 2011-04-06 16:17:35 UTC --- I was trying out this patch to see whether it might be usable to me, just as a preview. Firstly: Is this patch at a stage where it could be possible to complete

[Bug c++/47570] New: one() = 0 isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and is.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570 Summary: one() = 0 isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and is. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/47504] New: some constexpr calculations erroneously overflow when using negative numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47504 Summary: some constexpr calculations erroneously overflow when using negative numbers Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/47132] New: decltype can't deduce some operator return types when defining an auto function's return

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47132 Summary: decltype can't deduce some operator return types when defining an auto function's return Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/46696] New: Implicit copy constructor can't construct array of subtype with user-defined copy constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46696 Summary: Implicit copy constructor can't construct array of subtype with user-defined copy constructor. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/46600] New: Default move constructor copies array elements instead of moving them.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46600 Summary: Default move constructor copies array elements instead of moving them. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/46600] Default move constructor copies array elements instead of moving them.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46600 --- Comment #2 from Simon Hill yacwroy at gmail dot com 2010-11-22 23:21:04 UTC --- Sorry about that. All that work and I didn't even notice my test GCC was the wrong one.

[Bug c++/38069] New: function pointer exception specification not checked during assignment

at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38069

[Bug c++/12255] exception-specifications unchecked during assignment of pointer to function

--- Comment #5 from yacwroy at gmail dot com 2008-11-10 16:35 --- *** Bug 38069 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- yacwroy at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/38069] function pointer exception specification not checked during assignment

--- Comment #1 from yacwroy at gmail dot com 2008-11-10 16:35 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12255 *** -- yacwroy at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/38071] New: function pointer exception specification not checked during assignment

at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38071

[Bug c++/37719] New: incorrect type on warning of mismatched exception specification with templates

dot org ReportedBy: yacwroy at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37719