https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at ispras dot ru
--- Comment #12
: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: zhroma at ispras dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
I’ve recently found that tests, which are placed in gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg
folder are running in “torture” mode with different optimization options.
While working
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90001
--- Comment #5 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Retested patch separately, everything works.
Have found 2 more slow Fortran examples on (obsolete) spu platform and with
additional options like -O1/O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: zhroma at ispras dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Here I want to discuss the situation with modulo scheduler pass when
-freorder-blocks-and-partition is also enabled.
TL;DR Kindly ask RTL folks to fix ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84369
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at ispras dot ru
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87979
--- Comment #2 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Situation is same in the following tests on ia64 platform with -fmodulo-sched
enabled (with any of O1, O2, Os):
gcc.dg/torture/pr82762.c
gcc.c-torture/execute/20170419-1.c
We divide by zero when we try to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87979
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at ispras dot ru
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84032
--- Comment #4 from Roman Zhuykov ---
There is the following mistake in logic behind the code.
We want to schedule the branch instructions only as a last instruction in a
row. But when branch was scheduled and we add other instructions into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84032
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at ispras dot ru
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90001
--- Comment #4 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Thanks for testcase.
2-3 weeks ago I already caught and fixed this on my local branch, see some info
in the bottom.
Current algorithm which finds recurrence_length for all DDG strongly connected
components
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90001
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at ispras dot ru
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80112
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at ispras dot ru
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252
--- Comment #13 from Roman Zhuykov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Thus, Roman, can you please post your patch to gcc-patches?
Ok, in addition to comment 3 link, reposted it right now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252
--- Comment #7 from Roman Zhuykov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> insufficient SMS testsuite coverage.
Not sure it's helpful, but 3 weeks ago I succesfully reg-strapped some bunch of
my SMS patches including this fix on x86-64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252
--- Comment #3 from Roman Zhuykov ---
I'll try to help. While working with expanding SMS functionality 4-5 years ago
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01807.html), I create several
fixes not connected to my main non-doloop-support
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: zhroma at ispras dot ru
Created attachment 30164
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30164action=edit
Preprocessed minimized testcase
On ARM, gcc 4.9 revision 198928 and later sometimes creates wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
Bug #: 55081
Summary: [4.8 regression?] Non-optimized static array elements
initialization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
17 matches
Mail list logo
