http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
--- Comment #6 from zhudiqi at 163 dot com 2011-11-13 12:59:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I guess we can close this as fixed in 4.7.0.
Yes, I think so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
--- Comment #2 from zhudiqi at 163 dot com 2011-09-16 11:40:42 UTC ---
BUG1:
auto sz = []()->constexpr long { return 100L; };
int arr[sz()];
Why constexpr for lambda won't be compiled? Can i not use auto type for a
lambda variant?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
--- Comment #1 from zhudiqi at 163 dot com 2011-09-16 11:36:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25304
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25304
lambda for array size def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
Bug #: 50431
Summary: lambda bug for array size def
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
