[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-21 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-21 17:53 --- CC'ed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at

[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-20 Thread mmazur at kernel dot pl
--- Additional Comments From mmazur at kernel dot pl 2005-02-20 18:12 --- I've recompiled the whole thing with -O0. Still doesn't work. If this is a miscompilation, then gcc4 is seriously borked on alpha. Any suggestions what to do with this? (I need gcc4 on alpha :) --

[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-19 19:44 --- hmm, RTH was able to build and report Ada results on alpha-linux-gnu: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-02/msg00683.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089

[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-19 Thread mmazur at kernel dot pl
--- Additional Comments From mmazur at kernel dot pl 2005-02-19 20:10 --- I've managed to google myself to PR18434 so looks like there is something wrong with alpha. Though I've seen stuff being broken depending on what languages are marked as supported (I've turned on only c++

[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-19 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-02-19 20:32 --- Yes this is probably a miscompilation of gnatmake, you may try to set boot flags to -O0 or -O1 instead of -O2. No idea on why RTH doesn't see this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089