http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #24 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-12-16 16:24:19
UTC ---
Indeed, the build went smoothly. Thank you all specially Eric Botcazou for
fixing this issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 09:18:55
UTC ---
Hmm, other way to solve this might be to add to structure the optional
attribute gcc_struct. At least I used that to fix libquadmath for 32-bit IA
Windows.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13
10:05:54 UTC ---
Hmm, other way to solve this might be to add to structure the optional
attribute gcc_struct. At least I used that to fix libquadmath for 32-bit IA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13
11:21:32 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 13 11:21:28 2011
New Revision: 182275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182275
Log:
PR ada/49084
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #23 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-12-14
01:03:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
Patch applied.
Thanks! Good to have Ada back on x86 MinGW.
Regards,
Cesar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #16 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-12-10
23:03:13 UTC ---
As can be seen in the assembler code above, the Ada compiler thinks the Node
structure is 32 bytes in size, while the C compiler thinks its size is 36
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #15 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-12-08
01:23:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Unfortunately I don't seem to be able to reproduce on Linux. Could you see
what object code has been generated for the line
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-04
21:59:13 UTC ---
(gdb) call pn(gnat_root)
N_Compilation_Unit (Node_Id=1707) (source,analyzed)
Parent = empty
Sloc = 9966 a-charac.ads:16:12
Context_Items = List
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #11 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-11-27
20:55:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25922
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25922
Debug log of PR49084
The cause of the access violation is due to an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-27
22:06:23 UTC ---
The cause of the access violation is due to an attempt to pass a null string
pointer to asprintf in internal_error_function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #13 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-11-28
00:46:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Zero is UNKNOWN_LOCATION. The problem is probably that the location mapping
isn't initialized yet. What happens if you move
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #10 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-11-24
00:22:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #7)
Hmm, this is due usage of %lld in printf-formatter. Does following patch
fix your issue?
I did
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #9 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-11-22
21:49:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Hmm, this is due usage of %lld in printf-formatter. Does following patch
fix your issue?
I did encounter the build failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #8 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 01:09:00
UTC ---
with snapshot gcc-4.7-2005, there are syntax errors in adainit.c,
initialize.c, seh_init.c and tracebak.c. These files are located at /gcc/ada
directory which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #6 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-08-04 16:01:59
UTC ---
The configuration --enable-languages=ada --without-build-config
--disable-werror was used.
Now it causes gcc to fail when configuration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-02
14:12:01 UTC ---
Does it work now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #4 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 15:40:34
UTC ---
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:18 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #5 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 20:28:03
UTC ---
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:41 AM, anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #2 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-05-23 18:49:10
UTC ---
It will be fine if the fix goes into the latest snapshot.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
25 matches
Mail list logo
