http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50934
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org 2012-05-27 10:22:42 UTC ---
This problem has been fixed in the released 4.7.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50934
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50934
--- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org 2011-11-03 08:14:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 25699
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25699
Simpler demonstrator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50934
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org 2011-11-03 17:34:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
It seems to me that this new approach is a remarkably non-Ada way of
addressing
the problem; the original design is precisely the way that it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50934
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Allocated address for new |Attribute
