Re: [Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-13 Thread Arnaud Charlet
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (targ): Fix target name check. Having to deal with the target_alias instead of the canonical form found in target seems rather counterintuitive and fragile to me. The ChangeLog entry is misleading, neither Pascal nor I have anything to do with

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-13 Thread charlet at adacore dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 --- Comment #7 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com --- * gcc-interface/Makefile.in (targ): Fix target name check. Having to deal with the target_alias instead of the canonical form found in target seems

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-13 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-08 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-07 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-05-07 14:57:20 UTC --- --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-06 16:55:04 UTC --- This doesn't happen in

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-07 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-07 15:06:45 UTC --- But what's the justification for the relevant change, which wasn't posted to gcc-patches AFAICS? 2013-04-23 Eric Botcazou

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-07 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-05-07 15:09:04 UTC --- --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-07 15:06:45 UTC --- But what's the

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-07 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-07 16:04:07 UTC --- This seems to argue for reverting or at least reworking the change. I suppose I'll withhold my patch until it's decided how to proceed. I'd

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

2013-05-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW