https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||85047
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
--- Comment #7 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> It would be nice if acats could honor dejagnu RUNTESTFLAGS. That is,
> I regularly do
>
> make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-g"
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
--- Comment #6 from simon at pushface dot org ---
I tried check-gnat, which also shows additional lto-related failures.
Running with lto shows 5 additional FAILs (and 3 fewer PASSes???)
LTO:
Running target unix/-flto/-g0
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018, simon at pushface dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
>
> simon at pushface dot org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Just as a side-note can we, for increased testing coverage, enable -g with
> acats by default?
Yes, -O2 -g as the default is fine with me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Just as a side-note can we, for increased testing coverage, enable -g with
acats by default?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
