[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-29 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #18) > The setjmp ICE seen by David and Iain should be fixed by > r10-6305-g5aebfb71763c7c8d0bb96adcd0a5f94de96a2a13 > > As noted in

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-28 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #18 from David Malcolm --- The setjmp ICE seen by David and Iain should be fixed by r10-6305-g5aebfb71763c7c8d0bb96adcd0a5f94de96a2a13 As noted in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01889.html, I reproduced the bug and

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5aebfb71763c7c8d0bb96adcd0a5f94de96a2a13 commit r10-6305-g5aebfb71763c7c8d0bb96adcd0a5f94de96a2a13 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15) > (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #14) > > Compiler version: 10.0.1 20200124 (experimental) [src revision > >

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #14) > Compiler version: 10.0.1 20200124 (experimental) [src revision > 96f7f2867f2:1b708f12f4b:5026cbde65e724347cc2d2797026bb7bb12578f1] (GCC) > > You can see

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-24 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn --- Compiler version: 10.0.1 20200124 (experimental) [src revision 96f7f2867f2:1b708f12f4b:5026cbde65e724347cc2d2797026bb7bb12578f1] (GCC) You can see

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #13 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #12) > (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #11) > > I continue to see setjmp failures on AIX. > > > [...] > > FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/setjmp-8.c (internal compiler

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #12 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #11) > I continue to see setjmp failures on AIX. > [...] > FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/setjmp-8.c (internal compiler error) > during IPA pass: analyzer >

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-24 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn --- I continue to see setjmp failures on AIX. FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/setjmp-7a.c expected multiline pattern lines 41-110 not found: FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/setjmp-7a.c (test for excess errors) Excess errors:

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #10 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #9) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8) [...] > I haven't seen failures before. ^ "these failures", I meant to say [...] > > > > Do you

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #9 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8) > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #7) > > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #6) > > [...] > > > On Solaris (both sparc and x86), all

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #7) > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #6) > [...] > > On Solaris (both sparc and x86), all analyzer testsuite failures are > > gone. > > Thanks.

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-23 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-23 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- > Sorry about the failing tests. > > As noted in comment #4, r10-6152-gda7cf663b75513e4d2baf5a579ffcb4f8a61193b > hopefully fixes all of these

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-22 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from David

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da7cf663b75513e4d2baf5a579ffcb4f8a61193b commit r10-6152-gda7cf663b75513e4d2baf5a579ffcb4f8a61193b Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-22 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to sandra from comment #1) [...] > Also observed on nios2-elf: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/pattern-test-2.c == 0 (test for warnings, > line 21) > FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/pattern-test-2.c != 0 (test

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-20 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-20 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

2020-01-18 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0