https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> However I'm confused by the "can be declared with const [constParameter]"
> warnings in comment #0 - they look const to me. What are these messages
> trying to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-28
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
I use something like
cppcheck --enable=all --language=c++ trunk.git/gcc/analyzer/*.{h,cc}
This seems to work to me, although my copy of cppcheck is a hand
tweeked version of their development code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing this. I've been attempting to reproduce this, but I'm not
getting any warnings out of cppcheck.
That said, looking at
git show
a96f1c38a787fbc847cb014d4b094e2787d539a7:gcc/analyzer/diagn
