[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5254d6b75fe6be669396cd1261f1cba829cc451 commit r12-558-gb5254d6b75fe6be669396cd1261f1cba829cc451 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-05 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > Created attachment 50759 [details] > updated patch > > Fixed missing setting of wi.stmt in lower_emutls_phi_arg I regstrapped r12-248+ first patch (I added

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50756|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-05 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe --- * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0) frame #0: 0x0001016a4bb3 cc1`::gimple_code(g=0x) at gimple.h:1782 1779 static

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 50756 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50756=edit patch This patch survives the new testcase with a cc1 cross to darwin and it does produce expected results when I

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-05-01 00:00:00 |2021-05-05

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-04 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- of course, this could be exposing some prexisting problem (but i did check that the previous revision did not show the problem). -fno-ipa-ra makes no difference.

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-04 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- master @r12-438 doesn't fail compare debug (maybe some later change masks this) I think this will reproduce on a stage 1.. reduced: a; _Thread_local b; c() { long d = b; a = 0; b = 0; } cc1

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 4 May 2021, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 > > --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) >

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-04 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > Doesn't reproduce on x86_64-linux with bootstrapping with in-tree mpfr 4.1.0 > > it might well be some

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-04 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Doesn't reproduce on x86_64-linux with bootstrapping with in-tree mpfr 4.1.0 it might well be some corner-case, but Darwin is PIC by default, so it might be

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Doesn't reproduce on x86_64-linux with bootstrapping with in-tree mpfr 4.1.0

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- this happens with mpfr-4.x sources and not with mpfr-3.1.6.

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|