https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103820
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103820
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0552605b7b27dc6beed62e71bd05bc1efd191c0d
commit r12-6430-g0552605b7b27dc6beed62e71bd05bc1efd191c0d
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103820
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index 284b9507466..9d6786c5c2e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -8588,7 +8588,8 @@ (define_peephole2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103820
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #3)
> Thanks for investigating this HJ (I'm having difficulty configuring my
You can bootstrap 32bit GCC on Linux/x86-64 if 32-bit libraries are
available.
> system to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103820
--- Comment #3 from Roger Sayle ---
Thanks for investigating this HJ (I'm having difficulty configuring my system
to reproduce this). Is the TARGET_64BIT guard needed by both peephole2s, or is
one sufficient to restore bootstrap? Your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103820
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
