--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-05
06:50 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> yes it's true, but it's not a solution I'm trying to isolate to problem :)
I already did in PR 21766. See comment #4.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21878
--- Additional Comments From sherpya at netfarm dot it 2005-06-05 06:48
---
yes it's true, but it's not a solution I'm trying to isolate to problem :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21878
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-05
06:30 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> the problematic dirs are target-libiberty target-libstdc++-v3
> since adding this to target:
> skipdirs="target-libiberty target-libstdc++-v3"
> compiles fine (cross compiling with
--- Additional Comments From sherpya at netfarm dot it 2005-06-05 03:59
---
the problematic dirs are target-libiberty target-libstdc++-v3
since adding this to target:
skipdirs="target-libiberty target-libstdc++-v3"
compiles fine (cross compiling with linux), anyway I suppose this cannot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-02
14:30 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21766 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From sherpya at netfarm dot it 2005-06-02 13:17
---
Linux cross:
Linux 2.6.x i686 GNU/Linux
Debian/Sid
System wide binutils 2.15
mingw32-binutils version 2.16
../gcc/configure -v \
--prefix=/usr \
--ta
--- Additional Comments From sherpya at netfarm dot it 2005-06-02 13:17
---
Created an attachment (id=9013)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9013&action=view)
Debug output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21878