--- Comment #26 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-02-19 15:00 ---
patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00775.html
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-30 17:33
---
Bootstrap is unbroken, lowering severity.
What did you mean exactly here? :-) Severity is still blocker.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #24 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-14 11:17
---
Bootstrap is unbroken, lowering severity.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 23:32 ---
P1 blocker regression for GCC 4.3, and no activity for 3 months.
PING!
Either someone at Apple or Paolo should show some activity here. Otherwise we
might as well close this as WONTFIX, assuming it is apparently
--- Comment #22 from mrs at apple dot com 2007-12-17 04:10 ---
:-(
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #23 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-12-17 06:14 ---
You're perfectly right; OTOH if I hadn't meant to fix it, I would have
unassigned it. Sometimes people are busy, and for a build patch I usually do
more than bootstrap/regtest on one architecture.
--
--- Comment #20 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 16:51 ---
Next week has come and gone... News?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #19 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-09-21 07:50 ---
I have a patch, I'll get around to testing it next week, promised. :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #18 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-09-02 11:29 ---
*** Bug 32161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-29 18:31
---
Can this now be closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #17 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-06-29 19:25 ---
And that's why I left it assigned to me. I'll work on it next week.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #16 from echristo at apple dot com 2007-06-29 19:00 ---
No, we shouldn't close it until we can get the compiler building on ppc with
-mdynamic-no-pic.
--
echristo at apple dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-24 07:17 ---
For me too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-24 15:31 ---
I have run what I can of the testsuite (gcc, g++, gfortran, and objc) without
regression. I have also run my version of the polyhedron tests and got:
with Makefile.*'s from revision 124627
1891.060u 84.040s
--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-23 15:24 ---
I have a Mac so I can fix this, but I'm not sure on the timing. I'm commenting
out the BOOT_CFLAGS setting for a moment to unbreak bootstrap.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-23 15:26 ---
Subject: Bug 32009
Author: bonzini
Date: Wed May 23 14:26:31 2007
New Revision: 124990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124990
Log:
2007-05-23 Paolo Bonzini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-23 15:39 ---
I have a Mac so I can fix this, but I'm not sure on the timing.
I'm commenting out the BOOT_CFLAGS setting for a moment to unbreak bootstrap.
I'll give a try tonight, but it should work (I am not sure to
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-23 21:48 ---
With the last patch the build passed the critical point!-)
I'll have the full build tomorrow morning (Paris time).
Thanks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #12 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-24 06:21
---
build completed. As expected.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-22 10:33 ---
Please try this patch on top of the previous one. Its purpose is just to
validate the logic of the previous one, it's not meant to be committed.
Index: libgcc/configure.ac
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-22 16:55 ---
Please try this patch on top of the previous one.
Sorry, bad news again: I got the same failure (still have -mdynamic-no-pic).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-21 08:19 ---
I know what's going on :-)
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-21 08:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=13593)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13593action=view)
tentative patch?
Please test this patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-21 13:04 ---
Sorry about the bad news, but I still have the very same failure with the
patch:
# @multilib_dir@ is not really necessary, but sometimes it has
# more uses than just a directory name.
/bin/sh
--- Comment #4 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-21 13:06
---
Nope. It clinches somehow with this one: config/mh-ppc-darwin. Here the
BOOT_CFLAGS is set to -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic.
In the libgcc Makefile.in I see that MULTILIB_CFLAGS is set to CFLAGS + extra
stuff. CFLAGS
--- Comment #5 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-21 22:39
---
Late night comment, Paolo, I think your patch is fine but it exposed an
inconsitency in using CFLAGS/BOOT_CFLAGS in libgcc.
I could work around the problem with filtering out the mdynamic-no-pic inside
the libgcc
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression |bootstrap
Keywords||build
28 matches
Mail list logo
