--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-05 06:13 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 13:06 ---
I believe those issues are fixed now. Can someone please confirm it?
(I've managed to swap two versions of patches and commit development version of
it)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-05-02 13:09 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I believe those issues are fixed now. Can someone please confirm it?
(I've managed to swap two versions of patches and commit development version
of
it)
Gcc is broken due to PR
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-05-02 14:36 ---
(In reply to comment #6 and #7)
I believe those issues are fixed now. Can someone please confirm it?
Incremental builds now work.
Gcc is broken due to PR 36108. I am testing gcc now by reverting revision
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 19:01 ---
I see the same issue on x86_64-*-freebsd.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 19:05 ---
And similar thing on PPC64-linux.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-05-01 22:30 ---
I have applied the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg00066.html, now stage 2 fails
later with:
/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/./prev-gcc/
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-05-01 23:03 ---
I saw the same thing on Linux/Intel64.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-05-01 23:05 ---
This is caused by revision 134859
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-05/msg00019.html
which also caused PR 36100.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
