[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 11:17 --- So, this particular bug (trunk bootstrap failure on i686,ppc-darwin) is fixed now? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36864

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #19 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-20 11:34 --- So, this particular bug (trunk bootstrap failure on i686,ppc-darwin) is fixed now? Revision 137991 bootstraped on i686 and ppc darwin9. What about hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11? Thanks for the fix. --

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 11:38 --- I have no idea if that is still broken. Steve? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-20 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 12:25 --- hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 is fixed. (Mentioned it yesterday on irc ;)) I'd say close this bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36864

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 12:43 --- Thus, fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-19 09:57 --- If I understand correctly http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01262.html, the patch causing this PR will have to be reverted anyhow. Could this be done now? -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #7 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 12:33 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9 this is not a correct understanding, we are just testing what is the best fix. I've posted a patch to bandaid this while we test

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #8 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 12:36 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9 I'll attach the patch here in case you want to test it first. On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 8:33 AM, dberlin at dberlin dot org [EMAIL

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-19 15:51 --- With the patch in comment #9, libgfortran built without failure. Now building libjava for the next hour (if everything goes well). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36864

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-19 17:48 --- Bootstraped with the patch, but pr36806 is still there. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36864

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 19:33 --- Bootstrap ok on x86_64-apple-darwin and i686-apple-darwin multilib. Bootstrap not ok on powerpc-apple-darwin. fails with: Volumes/development/gcc/tuples/gcc/libgfortran/generated/matmul_i4.c: In function

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 19:46 --- Can you provide what gdb call debug_tree (expr) in extract_ops_from_tree prints? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36864

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 20:03 --- Subject: Bug 36864 Author: andreast Date: Sat Jul 19 20:02:29 2008 New Revision: 137991 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137991 Log: 2008-07-19 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 20:31 --- Ok here the output requested in comment #13, I hope I did catch it correctly: (gdb) i b Num Type Disp Enb AddressWhat 2 breakpoint keep y 0x00272f78 in extract_ops_from_tree at

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 20:36 --- Try Index: gimple.c === --- gimple.c(revision 137977) +++ gimple.c(working copy) @@ -2561,7 +2561,8 @@ get_gimple_rhs_num_ops (enum

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-19 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 20:56 --- I retire the bootstrap error on ppc-darwin (matmul_i4). I did bootstrap with tuples branch and mixed information, sorry. I'll redo a bootstrap on ppc-darwin with trunk. --

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-18 06:46 --- This is due to revision 137859: 2008-07-15 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (expressions_equal_p): Check type equality. * tree-ssa-pre.c (pre_expr_eq): Ditto

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36864

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-18 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-18 21:05 --- Also happens on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 -- andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
-- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36864

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-17 22:24 --- 0x004ffca7 in get_constant_for_value_id (v=427, type=0x4402c710) at /Users/apinski/src/local/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:1027 -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-17 22:28 --- Full backtrace: #0 0x00502761 in get_constant_for_value_id (v=427, type=0x42e163f0) at /Users/apinski/src/local/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:1027 #1 0x005029f4 in fully_constant_expression (e=0x440408d8) at

[Bug bootstrap/36864] [4.4 Regression] Yet another bootstrap failure on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-07-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-17 22:30 --- Created an attachment (id=15927) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15927action=view) Preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36864