[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-12-08 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 20:34 --- Should be fixed: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-12/msg00125.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-12/msg00124.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-12/msg00068.html

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-30 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 08:22 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-11/msg02671.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38314

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 18:44 --- Ah, I see the problem in the config.log. The inaccurate output of uname under the i386 kernel on a EMT64 chipset is confusing configure such that... $ ../gcc/configure --prefix=/Users/howarth/inst_gcc

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 19:23 --- The uname output looks like a red herring. I substituted a script for uname that executes... #!/bin/sh uname_aside $@ | /usr/bin/sed 's/i386/x86_64/' and the build still fails. I wonder if we could fix

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 19:31 --- A starting point would be this: [wolfram:head/gcc/gcc] andreast% svn diff config/i386/t-darwin64 Index: config/i386/t-darwin64 === ---

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #8 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 20:03 --- Thanks! With your patch, gcc now makes it into stage 2 and is still building. I would suggest we use... MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = IA32 as Apple often using I386 but also builds for i686-apple-darwin as well. I

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #9 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 20:11 --- Andreas, Can you try the proposed patch on darwin9 for the x86-64-apple-darwin9 target? I will do a complete make check on darwin10 with the x86_64-apple-darwin10 triplet. I am surprised by this issue

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 20:24 --- At the time I did x86_64-apple-darwin* stuff I asked apple people if they intend to do multilib on this target, the answer was no. So I did not bother any longer. I do not know if IA32 is correct. I use i386 for

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #11 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 20:35 --- Apple wasn't concerned about the multilib issue since they do everything as lipo files. So I suspect it is rather academic on what we choice for the 32-bit subdirectory name. --

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #12 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 21:06 --- The bootstrap is failing at... make DESTDIR= RPATH_ENVVAR=DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH TARGET_SUBDIR=x86_64-apple-darwin10 bindir=/Users/howarth/inst_gcc/bin datadir=/Users/howarth/inst_gcc/share

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #13 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 21:09 --- Why is it okay for cc1-checksum.o and cc1plus-checksum.o to differ but not gcc.o? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38314

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 21:20 --- gcc.o differing is severe, while *checksum.o depend on some version information differing. I propose to do a real clean build. No build over build. My build on x86_64-apple-darwin9 is in the last stage, linking

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #15 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 21:28 --- It may be due to another patch I was testing. I am doing a clean bootstrap without the other patches. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38314

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #16 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-30 00:57 --- The problem was a dirty build directory. A clean bootstrap has completed and a complete make check for -m32 and -m64 is underway under darwin10. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38314

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 04:12 --- ../gcc/configure --prefix=/Users/howarth/inst_gcc --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,java --with-gmp=/sw --with-libiconv-prefix=/sw --with-system-zlib --x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include