[Bug bootstrap/39977] [4.5 Regression] r1467817 broke bootstrap on PA

2009-05-01 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #3 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-05-01 15:54 --- Looking at exp when we enter expand_expr_addr_expr_1 I see: ssa_name 79f80070 type real_type 79f56e70 TFtype TF size integer_cst 79edb760 constant 128 unit size integer_cst 79edb780 constant 16

[Bug bootstrap/39977] [4.5 Regression] r1467817 broke bootstrap on PA

2009-05-01 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-01 17:22 --- That shouldn't happen yes. We are trying to expand __fixunstfdi (D.1248_5) As far as the gimple side is concerned this is a normal pass-by-value call hence the SSA name therein is perfectly fine. But it seems the

[Bug bootstrap/39977] [4.5 Regression] r1467817 broke bootstrap on PA

2009-05-01 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #5 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-05-01 18:30 --- The proposed patch fixed my bootstrap failure. I haven't run the testsuite yet to look for regressions but the bootstrap is working. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39977

[Bug bootstrap/39977] [4.5 Regression] r1467817 broke bootstrap on PA

2009-05-01 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #6 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-05-01 20:01 --- I finished testing and it looks OK. The failures that I see also appear on other platforms (hppa64 and ia64) so I think the patch is good. FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-4.C -O (internal compiler error) FAIL:

[Bug bootstrap/39977] [4.5 Regression] r1467817 broke bootstrap on PA

2009-04-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-30 17:59 --- Seems related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29209 which seems like it was worked around in 4.3 and 4.4 but exposed again with the SSA expand patch. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: