--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 22:47 ---
Darwin not using (a non-ancient version of) the GNU assembler is sufficient
explanation for any assembler syntax issue appearing there but not on other
targets. Closing as fixed.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org ch
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-07-04 14:20 ---
I have posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-07/msg00317.html
the test results for revision 149193. There are new failures for which I'll
open PRs ASAP (if nobody is quicker).
Before closing this PR a
--- Comment #7 from meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 22:34
---
Subject: Bug 40558
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Jul 1 22:34:26 2009
New Revision: 149155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149155
Log:
Fix PR 40558, undo part of June 25th patch
Modified:
--- Comment #6 from meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 22:23
---
Created an attachment (id=18114)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18114&action=view)
Patch to undo change that breaks darwin9
I'm adding the missing ChangeLog comments also.
--
http://gcc.g
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-07-01 15:15 ---
The patch in comment #3 (with - for new and + for old) applied on top of
revision 148955 seems to fix the problem (currently building libjava).
Thanks Andrew.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40558
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 04:26 ---
None of the print_operand changes are in the changelog either ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40558
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 04:24 ---
This change:
if (GET_CODE (tmp) == REG)
- fprintf (file, "0,%s", reg_names[REGNO (tmp)]);
+ fprintf (file, "%s,%s", reg_names[0], reg_names[REGNO (tmp)]);
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 04:22 ---
Confirmed, simple testcase:
void f(int *a, float b)
{
*a = b;
}
--- CUT ---
This produces:
_f:
fctiwz f1,f1
stfiwx f1,r0,r3
blr
But it should produce:
_f:
fctiwz f1,f1
stfiw
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-26 21:39 ---
I am going to be looking at this over the weekend for Michael.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40558
10 matches
Mail list logo