http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-01
17:24:27 UTC ---
Hmm, I tried to use one of compile farm sparc machines, but no luck. Either
with ssh on them I end on gcc12 that is amd64 or they are down.
I am looking into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-01
17:35:47 UTC ---
Hmm, I tried to use one of compile farm sparc machines, but no luck. Either
with ssh on them I end on gcc12 that is amd64 or they are down.
Try grobluk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #20 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-01 18:34:45 UTC ---
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-01
17:24:27 UTC ---
Hmm, I tried to use one of compile farm sparc machines, but no luck. Either
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #21 from hainque at adacore dot com hainque at adacore dot com
2010-10-01 22:11:52 UTC ---
hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
We might be missing some code in inliner that passes the fact that
the label is user label...
I don't yet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #17 from hainque at adacore dot com hainque at adacore dot com
2010-09-30 09:23:25 UTC ---
ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Eric, Olivier,
could you please have a look at Jan's question in Comment #6? This
bug currently breaks Ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #13 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-09-30 01:18:27 UTC ---
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
Hi,
I would really apprechiate the answer to comment #6. Since the patch should
only
introduce more (valid)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-09-30 01:26:27 UTC ---
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca wrote:
For reference, I have also attached the hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 .s file.
The problem is the reference to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-09-28 12:07:54 UTC
---
Hi,
I would really apprechiate the answer to comment #6. Since the patch should
only
introduce more (valid) inlining this must be latent bug somewhere
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hainque at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-28
12:34:28 UTC ---
Eric, Olivier,
could you please have a look at Jan's question in Comment #6? This bug
currently breaks Ada bootstrap on Solaris 2/SPARC and hampers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-09-28 15:32:01 UTC ---
Hi,
I would really apprechiate the answer to comment #6. Since the patch should
only
introduce more (valid) inlining this must be latent bug somewhere
In the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-09-27 17:48:14 UTC ---
Jan,
again, no progress at all for 2 1/2 weeks on a bootstrap failure on a
primary platform. Please fix or revert.
Rainer
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-09-17
08:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] Reference to undefined label building libada on
Solaris 2/SPARC
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 20:57
---
This is really strange
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-12 13:06 ---
*** Bug 45639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-09-10
15:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] Reference to undefined label building libada no
Solaris 2/SPARC
A reghunt identified that the regression was caused by this patch:
2010-09-07 Jan Hubicka j...@suse.cz
--- Comment #4 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 15:19 ---
Jan, could you please have a look.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 10:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=21749)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21749action=view)
assembler output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 11:09
---
This compiled fine on 20100907 for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
20 matches
Mail list logo
