[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-11-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-05 09:59:01 UTC --- Does http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00059.html fix it? Yes it does.

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-04 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-04 22:13:12 UTC --- Does http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00059.html fix it?

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 14:18:07 UTC --- We'll need to find out why stage1 gcc and stage2 gcc produce different output. To do that, the easiest thing to do is to copy object files from stage1 to

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-02 16:07:53 UTC --- We'll need to find out why stage1 gcc and stage2 gcc produce different output. To do that, the easiest thing to do is to copy object files from

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 16:35:28 UTC --- The files between stage1 and stage2 are supposed to differ. What isn't supposed to differ (after stripping optional debug information) is stage2 and stage3,

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-02 21:03:38 UTC --- The process isn't that lengthy, it's a binary search and shouldn't take more than half an hour maximum to identify the file that's being miscompiled.

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-09-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0