[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-29 15:12:50 UTC --- It is strange that regress is still able to bootstrap powerpc-apple-darwin9 with r174286 present. The powerpc-apple-darwin9 target also has...

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-28 12:16:38 UTC --- PR49208 is likely a duplicate of this PR.

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsg at

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-28 20:42:16 UTC --- This also caused all the ICE on regress (ppc-darwin9, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-05/msg03217.html ).

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-28 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerald at

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-28 22:29:00 UTC --- Might be best to revert the patch for now? Especially in the light of comment #3: Ugh. I do not have time to deal with this problem at the

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-27 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10,

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-27 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-27 17:51:07 UTC --- I have bootstrapped revision 174339 after reverting revision 174286.

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-27 Thread froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||froydnj at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-27 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-27 18:29:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Ugh. I do not have time to deal with this problem at the moment. But I don't understand how ASM_OUTPUT_WEAKREF isn't

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-27 Thread froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc