https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #41 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-04-15 09:27:09 UTC ---
I'm currently running a bootstrap of gcc 4.7.3 with this patch applied
and without any special
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.3 |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #39 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11
11:35:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 29857
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29857
Candidate fix
Ok, the --enable-checking made it reproducible. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #40 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-04-11 14:30:49 UTC ---
--- Comment #39 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11
11:35:33 UTC ---
[...]
Ok, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #36 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-04-05 10:41:42 UTC ---
With the new reduced testcase I'm now also able to reproduce the failure
on an x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #37 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-04-05 14:16:12 UTC ---
I forgot to mention that for the build to succeed you also need r184239:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #35 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-03 12:19:13
UTC ---
Created attachment 29792
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29792
new testcase
After some digging, I found a bit of what's going on: for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #34 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-03-26 10:18:00 UTC ---
Unfortunately, Andrew Pinski's patch from PR debug/51471 doesn't help
this time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-17 16:23:07 UTC ---
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13
20:36:16 UTC ---
PR51471 patch has been committed by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13
20:36:16 UTC ---
PR51471 patch has been committed by now, can you recheck if it didn't fix also
this PR?
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183038
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-04 13:33:20 UTC ---
--- Comment #28 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04
13:30:21 UTC ---
Was the patch installed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-12-21 16:20:12 UTC ---
With the exception of the unrelated Ada bootstrap failure (PR
ada/51624), your patch allowed a mips-sgi-irix6.5 bootstrap to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-12-19 16:40:33 UTC ---
--- Comment #25 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-16
20:05:16 UTC ---
Can you try the patch in PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-12-16 16:56:55 UTC ---
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
09:21:16 UTC ---
Can't reproduce with i686-linux x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #25 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-16
20:05:16 UTC ---
Can you try the patch in PR 51471#c11 ? That patch fixes most of the
maybe_record_trace_start on mips* for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-12-07 09:08:41 UTC ---
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
09:00:47 UTC ---
Can't reproduce that with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
09:21:16 UTC ---
Can't reproduce with i686-linux x mips-sgi-irix6.5 cross either.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25473|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-24 11:43:38 UTC ---
Bernd,
could you make some progress on this PR? IRIX bootstrap is broken for
more than two weeks now.
Thanks.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #19 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-24
12:10:21 UTC ---
It's really hard to run a gdb session this way. You're not a gcc newbie, and
you're the only one with an IRIX machine - can you not debug a bit further from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-18 15:37:49 UTC ---
--- Comment #16 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
17:37:11 UTC ---
Sorry, I was being imprecise -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-17 11:30:24 UTC ---
Bernd,
IRIX 6.5 bootstrap is now broken for more than a week. How should we
proceed with this?
Thanks.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
11:40:25 UTC ---
AFAIK there's no IRIX6.5 machine in the compile farm. Can you debug a bit at
the point of the crash to see what's going on?
Configure won't let me build the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-17 14:52:49 UTC ---
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
11:40:25 UTC ---
AFAIK there's no IRIX6.5 machine in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
15:04:17 UTC ---
Well, shooting in the dark, let's get a few preliminaries out of the way - what
are the return values of dwarf2out_do_cfi_asm() and targetm.debug_unwind_info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-17 15:50:06 UTC ---
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
15:04:17 UTC ---
Well, shooting in the dark, let's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 15:52:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 25521
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25521
nothrow dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 15:53:11
UTC ---
Created attachment 25522
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25522
dwarf2 dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 15:54:02
UTC ---
Created attachment 25523
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25523
final dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
16:34:42 UTC ---
Ok, so there are two restore_state notes following each other; note 374 and
note 375. We'll want a breakpoint in add_cfi to catch the two calls where these
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-17 17:13:10 UTC ---
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
16:34:42 UTC ---
Ok, so there are two restore_state
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #16 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
17:37:11 UTC ---
Sorry, I was being imprecise - only the instances where we generate notes 374
and 375 are interesting. Can you identify these two?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 13:09:59 UTC
---
Created attachment 25473
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25473
unreduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-12 15:37:46 UTC ---
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 13:08:48
UTC ---
The reghunt is not yet complete, but the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12
16:46:23 UTC ---
This doesn't seem to happen with a cross compiler :(
When you say in stage 2, do you mean the stage 1 compiler is crashing, or the
stage 2 compiler is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-12 16:53:32 UTC ---
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12
16:46:23 UTC ---
This doesn't seem to happen with a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
45 matches
Mail list logo
