http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #30 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-19 05:21:06 UTC ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Mon Nov 19 05:20:59 2012
New Revision: 193612
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193612
Log:
This patch addresses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #27 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
17:42:26 UTC ---
/* Now merge each file. */
for (gi_ptr = gcov_list; gi_ptr; gi_ptr = gi_ptr-next)
{
// Open existing gcda file for gi_ptr
//
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #28 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-16
18:03:08 UTC ---
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:42 AM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #29 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-11-16 18:57:41
UTC ---
I'm confused - that is essentially what it is doing today (although
comparing against the first merged file instead of the last merged
file). It isn't
Note though that this is not an assert. It just emits a message to
stderr. Do you think a better error message is appropriate? I'm not
sure the some data files may have been removed is an accurate
description of the issue. Perhaps something like Profile data file
mismatch may indicate corrupt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-11-15 10:56:53
UTC ---
Note though that this is not an assert. It just emits a message to
stderr. Do you think a better error message is appropriate? I'm not
sure the some data
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #25 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
14:34:10 UTC ---
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:56 AM, hubicka at ucw dot cz
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #26 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
22:42:12 UTC ---
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:56 AM, hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-14 15:06:44
UTC ---
With revision 193500, we got
libdecnumber -I../../src-trunk/gcc/../libdecnumber/bid -I../libdecnumber
-I../../src-trunk/gcc/../libbacktrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-14 15:08:53
UTC ---
There are
badness = (relative_time_benefit (callee_info, edge, edge_time)
* (INT_MIN / 16 / RELATIVE_TIME_BENEFIT_RANGE));
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-11-14 15:35:26 UTC
---
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-11-14 15:13:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
There are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-11-14 20:48:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 28688
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28688
testcase
The testcase is only reduced to 97K, but it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-14
23:03:27 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Nov 14 23:03:22 2012
New Revision: 193512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193512
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tejohnson at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #11 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
00:21:36 UTC ---
Sure, I will see if I can reproduce it.
Teresa
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:07 PM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 00:30:51
UTC ---
Revision 193513 gave:
../../src-trunk/gcc/common/common-targhooks.c: In function
'default_target_handle_option(gcc_options*, gcc_options*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
01:03:09 UTC ---
OK, the false positive is on quite sloppy code in gcov-io.c. I attached
testcase to PR55079 and will fix the gcc_assert specifying the loop bounds to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
01:07:04 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Nov 15 01:07:01 2012
New Revision: 193522
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193522
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
01:10:29 UTC ---
Note that profiledbootstrap still dies for me on
config.status: creating tests/rand/Makefile
../../libiberty/cp-demangle.c: In function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
01:17:43 UTC ---
Theresa: I am using gcc10 from compilation farm, but I think it is fairly
universal problem.
Also I think that gcc_assert should not be assert, but an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #17 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
01:28:47 UTC ---
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #18 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
01:33:43 UTC ---
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Oh got it - it is this one, right?:
profiling:/home/tejohnson/extra/gcc_trunk_3_obj/libcpp/files.gcda:Invocation
mismatch - some data files may have been removed
Yes, it is this one.
I think this one was there before, but I had to modify it after my
histogram change. I will take a look.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-11-15 01:42:55
UTC ---
Oh got it - it is this one, right?:
profiling:/home/tejohnson/extra/gcc_trunk_3_obj/libcpp/files.gcda:Invocation
mismatch - some data files may have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #20 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
01:52:45 UTC ---
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:42 PM, hubicka at ucw dot cz
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-11-15 02:01:01
UTC ---
Ok, I can do that. I had tried that but didn't see any gain yet (need
to take a look at my results again). I have been playing with teasing
apart the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #22 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
02:46:20 UTC ---
Ok, will see if I can submit that one tomorrow then, after double
checking the performance.
Teresa
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:01 PM, hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #23 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
06:44:00 UTC ---
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-10-25 06:51:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
LRA generates
This comment belongs to PR55049 (copied there).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-10-25 00:49:09
UTC ---
LRA generates
(gdb) call debug_rtx (insn)
(insn 6 20 7 2 (set (reg/f:SI 0 ax [orig:65 gomp_tls_data.ts.work_share ] [65])
(mem/f/j/c:SI (plus:SI
34 matches
Mail list logo
