[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-22 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-22 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-22 11:02:43 UTC --- Richard, did you already start to investigate seriously? If no, I can take it over if you want, it's SPARC and I have a big share in the problematic

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-22 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-22 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-22 18:26:05 UTC --- In fact the miscompilation is already eliminated by replacing the call to adjust_address with adjust_bitfield_address in store_bit_field. Not clear

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-21 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-21 18:56:23 UTC --- Please provide preprocessed source

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-21 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-21 21:00:00 UTC --- Created attachment 28757 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28757 preprocessed libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/dyncast.cc Full configuration

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-21 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-21 21:09:34 UTC --- Oh, I uploaded dyncast.i because that was the most recent ICE on my screen just now. It ICEs with the same message as class_type_info.cc so it should

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-21 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-21 23:28:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Created attachment 28757 [details] preprocessed libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/dyncast.cc Full configuration

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-20 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-20 22:21:45 UTC --- It's caused by r193599: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-11/msg00546.html

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-20 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

2012-11-19 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-19 19:32:37 UTC --- Fails at r193600 so not the same reason as PR55391. Bisecting...