http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Jan 20 11:20:24 2014
New Revision: 206802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
PR bootstrap/59496
* config/rs6000/darwin.h (ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Patch posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00816.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> darwin should simply add a dummy use of field, like via ((field), (...))
well, I thought of doing that, but it seems a kludge - is the target obliged to
use the ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
