[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #42 from Andrew Pinski --- Closing astatement invalid then.

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #41 from Joshua Kinard --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #38) > Does this work now? Whatever the issue on MIPS/N32 was, it's resolved by dropping -Wl,-z,now. So no longer an issue AFAICT.

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #39 from Richard Biener --- I believe the --disable-checking issue on ppc is still there. Wonder if somebody can try on ppc-linux ... (or other archs, I believe just nobody uses --disable-checking)

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #38 from Andrew Pinski --- Does this work now?

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5 --- Comment #37 from Richard

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #36 from Joshua Kinard --- (In reply to Joshua Kinard from comment #35) > > It looks like it's my LDFLAGS, specifically with -Wl,-z,now. It looks like this might be a problem with my toolchain, possibly in binutils, and possibly

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #35 from Joshua Kinard --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #34) > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, kumba at gentoo dot org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 > > > > --- Comment #33 from Joshua Kinard

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, kumba at gentoo dot org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 > > --- Comment #33 from Joshua Kinard --- > The problem may be tied to a particular

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #33 from Joshua Kinard --- The problem may be tied to a particular CFLAG on glibc-n32 MIPS. I ran our (Gentoo's) stage-building script, and forgot to block gcc-5.3.0 from building, and it ended up completing. Difference between

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #32 from Joshua Kinard --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #30) > Any status update? Does bootstrap work on trunk (with --disable-checking)? Okay, here's updates from the MIPS angle on a few configurations: MIPS-IV,

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.3 |5.4 --- Comment #31 from Richard

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #29 from Douglas Mencken --- Vanilla GCC 5.2 bootstraps perfectly (without --disable-checking) on my side

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #27 from Joshua Kinard kumba at gentoo dot org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #26) Don't hold your breath. Basically somebody who can reproduce it has to find the root-cause and a fix. 4.9.3 works, and the problem

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-darwin

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, kumba at gentoo dot org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #27 from Joshua Kinard kumba at gentoo dot org ---

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #25 from Joshua Kinard kumba at gentoo dot org --- Still present in gcc-5.2. Reverting commit r218976 also didn't help. Reproduced on a second MIPS machine running N32 ABI as well. any idea if this is being looked at for 5.3?

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3 ---

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 Joshua Kinard kumba at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kumba at gentoo

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #22 from Douglas Mencken dougmencken at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35619 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35619action=edit pre-processed source of genmatch

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Douglas Mencken from comment #20) I'm lost. “Vanilla” 5.1.0 configured without --disable-checking went thru stage2 w/o any issue... That's interesting - we might