[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-08-27 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #47 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #46) > Is this fixed for 9+ so far? Yes, fixed on trunk .. leaving it open pending backports.

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-08-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #46 from Jakub Jelinek --- Is this fixed for 9+ so far?

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-08-22 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #45 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Wed Aug 22 11:37:02 2018 New Revision: 263763 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263763&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix FDE labels for Darwin gcc/ PR bootstrap/81033 PR targ

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-08-17 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #44 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #43) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #42) > > (In reply to Elliot Saba from comment #41) > > > Has there been any progress on this? We are running into this whi

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-08-15 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-08-13 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #42 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Elliot Saba from comment #41) > Has there been any progress on this? We are running into this while trying > to cross-compile GCC for Darwin. Has this been fixed in 8.3.0? I will be posting two

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-08-11 Thread staticfloat at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Elliot Saba changed: What|Removed |Added CC||staticfloat at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-07-27 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #6|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-07-26 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremyhu at macports dot org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-07-26 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #38 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 7 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7&action=edit fix for 8.2 same discussion, patch on 262993 (8.2 release rev.)

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-07-26 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #37 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 6 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6&action=edit Proposed fix for trunk Subject: [PATCH] Fix P81033 for FDEs in partitioned code. Darwin has the ability to spli

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-07-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |8.3 --- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

2018-05-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |8.2 --- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek