[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

2020-06-08 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

2020-06-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1057cc0a8ad972e0a2218ab74038a56e5514c39 commit r11-1067-gc1057cc0a8ad972e0a2218ab74038a56e5514c39 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Mon

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

2020-06-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Host|

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

2020-06-06 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Host|powerpc64*-linux-gnu|

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

2020-06-05 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer --- bootstrap works with that patch

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

2020-06-05 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #2) > alternative_order[0] is guaranteed to be set, because alternative_reject[i] > <= alternative_reject[which_alternative] for i == which_alternative at > least. We

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

2020-06-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- alternative_order[0] is guaranteed to be set, because alternative_reject[i] <= alternative_reject[which_alternative] for i == which_alternative at least. We know that which_alternative <

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

2020-06-05 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- The reload_cse_simplify_operands() function allocates three arrays but resets only two: alternative_reject = XALLOCAVEC (int, recog_data.n_alternatives); alternative_nregs = XALLOCAVEC (int,