https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #15 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> In any case, the change to use -gdwarf-* by default even when not compiling
> just assembly was based on the assumption that gas would in that case pretty
> muc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 49382
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49382&action=edit
.s file generated with stage3 compiler
File 1 position looks similar to the example in binutils/26740.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard ---
I don't understand why the .debug sections are compared in this case.
But if they are then the diff comes from this gas issue:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26740
Even though unused gas -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-10-15 4:35 p.m., jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Those are debug sections. So contrib/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Those are debug sections. So contrib/compare-debug should be stripping them.
Or is this non-debug bootstrap where either both stage2 and stage3 are built
with -g or none of them?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-10-15 4:18 p.m., jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-10-15 3:58 p.m., jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> So, how do they differ? The comparison should be ignoring debug sections...
It looks like the .s file name is in object:
dave@atlas:~/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, how do they differ? The comparison should be ignoring debug sections...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Current bisect status:
git bisect start
# bad: [1c56c143b2011080d8a4516f37f78f647b0ee258] c++: Fix member alias
template in C++17 and up. [PR96805]
git bisect bad 1c56c143b2011080d8a4516f37f78f647b0ee258
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-12
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-10-12 2:18 a.m., rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Guess nobody will feel responsible without more info ... maybe you can bisect
> or provide a good initial hint (last known good rev. v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Keywords|
16 matches
Mail list logo
