https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The original intent in the C standard was definitely to allow at least
some cases of subobjects; the May 20, 1988 list of changes in the third
public review draft of C89 has as item 10 "The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
See also http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2396.htm#dr_496
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
On 12/16/20 12:45 PM, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
>
> --- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
> (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #2)
>> stu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #2)
> stupid underspecified offsetof
I did try commenting out the offending block of code and a re-build
and got further errors ;-<
I don't know if you have access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
