[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-26 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #36 from Hannes Domani --- Note: This is a binutils/ld bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268 And I've sent a patch there: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115434.html

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #35 from Richard Biener

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #34 from H.J. Lu --- This may be related to https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115395.html

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #32 from Jonathan Wakely --- FWIW Wine gives this error when trying to run binaries created by GCC trunk (and binutils 2.34): 0104:err:process:exec_process L"Z:\\tmp\\a.exe" not supported on this system Comparing the objdump -h outp

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-09 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #31 from Mikael Pettersson --- Created attachment 50158 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50158&action=edit conftest.c (based configure's cross compilation test) This runs Ok when compiled with "-O2 -g -gdwarf-4",

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-08 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #30 from Mikael Pettersson --- Patch has been posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/564990.html

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-07 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #29 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #25) > Created attachment 50138 [details] > do not default to dwarf5 on Windows > > I have the same problem with gcc-11 bootstrap failures due to Exec format > errors

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-07 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #28 from Mikael Pettersson --- (In reply to Brecht Sanders from comment #27) > @Mikael Pettersson, should a similar patch be applied to > gcc/config/i386/mingw-w64.h to fix this same issue in MinGW-w64? cygming.h is used for both min

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-07 Thread brechtsanders at users dot sourceforge.net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #27 from Brecht Sanders --- @Mikael Pettersson, should a similar patch be applied to gcc/config/i386/mingw-w64.h to fix this same issue in MinGW-w64?

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-06 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #26 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #25) > Created attachment 50138 [details] > do not default to dwarf5 on Windows > > I have the same problem with gcc-11 bootstrap failures due to Exec format > errors

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-06 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-03 Thread nix at esperi dot org.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #24 from Nix --- ... and ten seconds after I posted that it failed again. Looks like binutils isn't quite ready for DWARF 5 on Windows yet :(

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-03 Thread nix at esperi dot org.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #23 from Nix --- OK, that works: ignore me, in my case it was just using a too old binutils. (The error message emitted is... unhelpful: exec format error, really?)

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-03 Thread nix at esperi dot org.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Nix changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nix at esperi dot org.uk --- Comment #22 from Nix

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brechtsanders at users dot sourcef

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Liu Hao changed: What|Removed |Added CC|lh_mouse at 126 dot com| --- Comment #20 from Liu Hao --- 0. Y

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #19 from cqwrteur --- After reverting the change, the compilation succeeds. However, this is a temporary solution. https://bitbucket.org/ejsvifq_mabmip/mingw-gcc-mcf-gthread/src/master/9000-Revert-testsuite-Skip-DWARF-5-testcases-on-

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #18 from cqwrteur --- I can confirm it is the commit that breaks the bootstrap on windows 10 https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blobdiff;f=gcc/doc/invoke.texi;h=c290b6f4938f45e8d491d76d4940060e7b59be36;hp=3f30230b0c244245e23e29ea40

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelin

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16 from

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #15 from Liu Hao --- Why did you add me in CC without asking for my acknowledgement? If you had asked MSYS2 people, I am pretty sure you would have received more constructive suggestions.

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #14 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > So you need to figure it out, most people here don't have any access to > Windows. > If mingw64 is using binutils, there were important DWARF 5 related bugs in > in

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #13 from cqwrteur --- $ as --version GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.35.1 Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License versio

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- So you need to figure it out, most people here don't have any access to Windows. If mingw64 is using binutils, there were important DWARF 5 related bugs in in binutils 2.35, but for the known ones we've adde

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #11 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > In that range guess the only important change was the switch from -gdwarf-4 > to -gdwarf-5 by default. So either a bug in your assembler or linker or > something el

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jakub at redhat dot com| --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelin

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #9 from cqwrteur --- I tried to build this commit and it is successful. https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=0411ae7f08e0f5a8b02ff313d26d27a0f6d1bb34 which means it is another commit that breaks it. Daily bump of 2021-01-18

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #8 from cqwrteur --- I tried to build this commit and it is successful. https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=0411ae7f08e0f5a8b02ff313d26d27a0f6d1bb34 which means it is another commit that breaks it

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-28 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #7 from cqwrteur --- configure:3736: $? = 0 configure:3725: /home/unlvs/mcf_build/src/build-x86_64-w64-mingw32/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/unlvs/mcf_build/src/build-x86_64-w64-mingw32/./gcc/ -L/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib -L/mingw64/lib -is

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-01-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|boostrap failure on |[11 Regression] boostrap