https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
Looking at a current discussion of
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2563.html
it seems that there is agreement that the returned type from
get_return_object() does not need to match the coroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> > > I am by no means an expert at reading standardese - and it might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
great, that does simplify things - and means that a useful error can be
diagnosed from a mismatched type between g_r_o/g_r_o_o_a_f and the coroutine
ramp return value.
The statement about phasing of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #2)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> > I am by no means an expert at reading standardese - and it might be that I'm
> > not alone, (library writers might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> I am by no means an expert at reading standardese - and it might be that I'm
> not alone, (library writers might have made the same assumption) but it
> seems to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
I am by no means an expert at reading standardese - and it might be that I'm
not alone, (library writers might have made the same assumption) but it seems
to me that:
