[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

2021-06-04 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

2021-06-01 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Note, in looking at Carl's patch, it is only for adding the built-ins. I don't believe it adds direct support for {,u}divti3 and {,u}moddti3 to implement these for normal __int128 variables.

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

2021-06-01 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-01

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

2021-06-01 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt --- I believe this work is pending, but the patches are still under review.

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

2021-05-28 Thread jens.seifert at de dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 --- Comment #1 from Jens Seifert --- Same applies to modulo.